Over longer time periods (measured in thousands of years) the warming trend does not appear to be any faster than in past warming cycles. There have also been periods in the pre-industrial past where short term warming was at a greater rate than what we have seen in the last fifty years. Go check the data from various ice core tritium ratio analysis that is available on the NOAA website. Don't believe everything that Al Gore and Hollywood celebrities tell you.
2007-03-24 03:34:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you want to acquire furnish cash for local weather study, do you believe that you'll be able to get a cheque should you say," I want the furnish, as I believe that I can turn out that the figures that the present paradigm is centered upon are unsuitable" ? The high-quality environmentalist, David Bellamy, has been silenced, and refused airtime. There remains to be no confirmed causative hyperlink among the volume of Co2 within the surroundings, and an develop in worldwide temperatures. The WWWF pix of the polar bears swimming have been taken within the Arctic summer time; whilst the ice cap partly melts, as they could not rise up to picture within the iciness. The ice was once too thick! The East-Anglian uni study figures. "Oh! The figures do not fit our expectancies. Oh good. Keep quiet. Because we all know that we're proper." When the notion, and the religion is extra major than squarely dealing with the reliable doubts of plenty of non furnish-supported scientists, technology has been superceded through devout zealots. As Oliver Cromwell colourfully mentioned." I pray thee, within the bowels of Christ, remember that thou mayest be unsuitable."
2016-09-05 14:00:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since I don't know what the "proper" rate of climate change should be at any time, I'm not about to start flailing my arms in panic. Half a degree change over the last 100 years doesn't sound so catastrophic or unnatural. I would think a single volcano could do that.
2007-03-23 18:05:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I have all ways believed that global warming was real in fact i did a research paper about it last year. I am the only person in my family that believes that it is happening. I just saw Al gores movie "An Inconvenient Truth" and it made be think of how really screwed we are, and we did it to ourselves.
2007-03-23 18:12:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ~*AMANDA*~ 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
A tempest in a teacup being hyped by self-serving liberal
environmentalists...
Totally distorted by the man who invented the internet, Algore.
2007-03-23 19:09:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes i agree with you and i believe that everybody needs to pitch into help, or rare and beautiful animals will become exstinct and we dont want that,the earth will become a disgusting and weird plantet to live on and we dont want that for our children.KEEP IT GREEN AND CLEAN. im sure everybody can do something to help for example Recycle , recreate junk into beauty , DONT drop rubbish , dont burn wood and coal or bonfires or burnoffs, dont chop down trees if you do plant 10 new ones . Come On EveryBody Pitch In Now Before It Is Too Late Please Save The World Not Tomorrow ,Today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-23 19:32:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nope. Sorry, but your 'explanation' holds no water, either. Don't feel bad thought. No other 'explanations' do, either.
If everybody quit worrying and talking about it, it would change again in a few years, and, once again, worrying and talking and throwing money at it won't change anything then, either.
2007-03-23 19:22:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your Right,but with all the developing country's we could stop all emissions in the States. and they would just continue. its a done deal, sorry were doomed
i fear more for the wild Innocent animals
were the ones who caused it, so I don't feel so sorry for us.
I wish a virus would kill off most all humans
I have asked God in prayer for just such a virus
2007-03-23 19:02:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The real problem is excess energy in the biosphere (see link)
Not true. The real problem is human overpopulation.
2007-03-23 21:11:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It also went *down* for 30 years, while we were burning fossil fuels *and* CO2 was increasing. How do you explain that?
Hint: Look up 'deep time.'
2007-03-23 18:03:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by dukefenton 7
·
2⤊
3⤋