After Americans find that the facts of it was a plan to get big company's into IRAQ to rebuild and pay kick backs for getting the job contracts most people will agree with your question, not now but later they will, if any person has questions about the truth, go to PBS on line and look up dick Cheney or rums fields war, order the DVD of the program that aired on PBS TV, then you will know all the poor kids died for the greed of the ones in power, my son will never be made to go and die for the pleasure of the rich and their lies they can kiss my ***, i say to all of you use you heads, every time their has been a war why are we in someone Else's country , no one has ever came here looking for trouble, our government sends us to make trouble its like a big game for the rich, we die and they make money selling guns and job contracts, we are so very stupid and weak minded, look at all the problems in OUR nation, is it smart to be trying to rule the world when our country is falling apart, the answers to all questions is available to us if we are not to lazy to spend the time to find out, and when you do, you will no longer have trust, its as simple as that its one thing to hear people talk and wonder, but when you read the documented facts and see for your self how bad it really is, that makes us all look like idiots.
2007-03-23 16:40:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by JALISCO 2
·
2⤊
10⤋
what's going to ensue is they are going to be indicted for conflict crimes and crimes against humanity in the Hague. they're going to proclaim their innocence and scoff on the indictments. the european, China, Russia and different international locations that adhere to Hague convention will arrest Bush and Cheney in the event that they bypass by using their international locations. they could be extradited to the Hague and imprisoned on an identical time as they anticipate trial. the U. S. is a signatory to the Hague convention, yet at cases ( like refusing handy over the Nazi rocket scientists who based NASA) they have not cooperated with the courts orders. Bush and Cheney could have few places to stay and bypass to. Mexico and Canada might additionally arrest Bush and Cheney in the event that they stepped into their international locations. States including Hawaii, that signed the Hague convention previously it grew to grow to be a State, might additionally be compelled to arrest Cheney and Bush. 4 British voters who have been detained and tortured at Guantanamo then freed, because of the fact they have been harmless, have filed criminal costs in London against Bush, Cheney, Rove, Gonzales, Rice, Rumsfeld and US military commanders in Afghanistan. If the expenditures are stumbled directly to be valid by way of the courtroom, the courtroom will situation an arrest warrant which could be handed onto Scotland backyard and Interpol. Scotland backyard and Interpol will situation a worldwide alert that each and anybody civilized international locations ought to arrest the suspects in the event that they bypass by using their borders.
2016-10-19 11:45:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they should be tried; so should all of Congress. Democrats and Republicans. They're the ones that passed the vote for the war, Bush just acted upon it.
2007-03-23 20:56:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by BadKarma 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Not even close to fitting the definition of a war crime under this code.
And I have to ask you , would such a prosecution really accomplish anything positive for this country aside from satisfying some folks intense hatred of the man?? I'm not a huge Bush fan, but why keep expending energy here , instead of working toward some reasonable solutions which benefit America , Iraq , & the World?
2007-03-23 16:11:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by SantaBud 6
·
9⤊
4⤋
5 1/2 years since 9-11, no terrorist attacks in the US. The only reason Congress and the media say such things is because they know they're weak when it comes to national security...
I've been to Iraq three times, I guess you're saying that I'm a war criminal?
2007-03-23 16:35:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
if you know what 18 usc2441? stands for why in the creation dont you share it with us .but no they dont need tried for war crimes there doing there job. i heard today on the radio if you cant please every one just please yourself . i know thats totally different answer for the question you asked . Yes im sorry for the moms and dads that have lost there kids tough. but they have helped us people in the united states from being killed ..where o where is osama?
2007-03-23 16:31:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by deerolmind 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Nope, but people like Clinton and Kerry should be tried for Desertion and Treason
2007-03-23 17:06:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Boogerman 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
They will be!
He thinkd that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 gives him a get out of jail fre card, but the act is unconstitutional!
Seems as Bush has violated them all!
18 § 2441, "War Crimes" provides:
(a) Offense.--Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.
(b) Circumstances.--The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such breach or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
(c) Definition.--As used in this section the term 'war crime' means any conduct--
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a violation of common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva, 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party and which deals with non- international armed conflict; or
(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.
2007-03-23 16:19:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
2⤊
8⤋
To bad you were not visting the twin towers on 9/11/2001
It would have been a blast( for you)
2007-03-23 16:17:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ULTRA150 5
·
10⤊
2⤋
No, they thought they did what was right for this country. Defending this country is not a crime.
2007-03-23 16:55:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Southern girl 2
·
8⤊
1⤋