Which is better victory without honor? Or honor with defeat?
2007-03-23 15:39:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
Honour with defeat.
It is better to lose the battle but have your honour remain intact.
Though it would seem that more & more want to defeat others & get the victory, regardless of how their they get it & whether they are respected & keep thier honour afterwoods.
2007-03-23 15:52:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Honor with defeat is always better in my opinion than victory w/o honor.
2007-03-23 22:42:50 · answer #2 · answered by chauntee d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
victory without honor is not a victory and not noble
to have honor in defeat is a character trait that is the noblest of all
2007-03-23 22:49:45 · answer #3 · answered by sofmatty 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
honor with defeat is better than victory without honor I would rather have clear karma
2007-03-23 23:09:59 · answer #4 · answered by KarmicFacilitator2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honor wirh defeat because if u get victory without honor that means that u dont deseve what u got. And the other person/peolpe should haave gotten what u got because they worked for it and u didnt just like a job and getting money from that job
2007-03-24 18:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
victory without honor is okay because you have won no matter what defeat is good if you can graciously admit you dont care
2007-03-23 22:58:11 · answer #6 · answered by ninekittys 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honor with defeat. I can work with a loss, but i don't like disliking myself.
2007-03-23 22:47:26 · answer #7 · answered by RickySTT, EAC 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For me, honor with defeat...
2007-03-24 09:24:26 · answer #8 · answered by vani121 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I fought the school bully many years ago I got my butt kicked bad but I never went down & kept on giving it back as I could I walked away hurt but with honor I did not win but I gained more respect that day than I ever thought possable .
2007-03-23 22:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋