Last time I checked, macro evolution was still a badly organized set of assumptions, and you guys are still having a hard time trying to disprove the Bible. O, stupid me, I guess I'll never catch up to you guys intellectually, (thank God).
2007-03-23 15:06:16 · 14 answers · asked by ? 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lilGONZO: "I do understand its not fact... yet. but so far its the best idea we have..." --I really love you. You sooooo just made one of my points; any idea that doesn't involve God is going to be the one secular science tries to prove. There is another word for it....oh yeah, bias.
2007-03-23 15:16:05 · update #1
SKIPPY:
"Only unscientific religious blowhards make that micro/macro evolution distinction"
WHAT?! Another perfect example of the blind leading the blind.
I do hope some of you know the difference...
2007-03-23 15:19:01 · update #2
Desiree: Would those be giant trees? (sarcasm, ok...)
2007-03-23 15:20:21 · update #3
Geez, and I thought *I* was sarcastic. Dude, the only answers in your profile are on religion. Why is that? Don't you want a little diversity? You could show us your intellect on more subjects than one.
2007-03-23 15:09:34 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Macro Evolution is simply Micro Evolution to a greater degree. Is has nothing to do with assumptions. It's science and it's fact.
2007-03-23 22:14:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are being sarcastic of course but the sad part is that what you say is true. Evolution is one of the best supported and accepted scientific theories. Believing in Bible stories is symptomatic of ingrained conditioned thought and lack of healthy skepticism.
2007-03-23 22:15:11 · answer #3 · answered by Michael da Man 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
"macro evolution was still a badly organized set of assumptions"
-Let me guess, you checked a Christan source? They have a habit of blatently lying and twisting facts to suit their views.
There are thousands of solid pieces of evidence for evolution.
2007-03-23 22:14:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Only unscientific religious blowhards make that micro/macro evolution distinction.
All you are doing is proving your ignorance of biology and giving informed people are good excuse to ignore you.
2007-03-23 22:10:12 · answer #5 · answered by Skippy 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Quit reading Christian propaganda and go read an actual source. I'm sure you could possibly be as intelligent as us, but as long as you allow your mind to be set on what your religion tells you, then we will never know.
2007-03-23 22:40:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see you're still searching for fallen trees in a forest of giants
2007-03-23 22:11:48 · answer #7 · answered by Desiree J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
While you guys are still having a hard time proving the Bible.....okay.
2007-03-23 22:11:28 · answer #8 · answered by KS 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hey---if you want to pretend that fossil records really don't exist--& that the earth is really flat & standing on pillars (Samual1-Ch2v8)--your quite free to do so--good luck!!
2007-03-23 22:19:58 · answer #9 · answered by huffyb 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Assupmtions and scientific theories have different meanings. But then again I wouldn't expect you to know that.
2007-03-23 22:10:26 · answer #10 · answered by Armund Steel 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋