English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Like talking about the lifestyle and looking a photos bad? I feel bad like its wrong. What do you think?

2007-03-23 08:36:20 · 12 answers · asked by gaamale79 1 in Society & Culture Etiquette

12 answers

Nudism or Naturism is a completely legal lifestyle choice that many people participate in. Naturists are typically those who prefer nude beaches and other outdoor activities in appropriate places, while Nudists typically spend more time in Clubs and Resorts. The terms can be used interchangeably, since both are dedicated to social nudity in a non-sexual setting.

There's nothing wrong with looking at the informative sites, to learn more about it. Most real nudist sites have very few pictures, used only to illustrate relevant points. The sites with many pictures are usually not run by nudists and many of the pictures are not nudist pictures at all. Notice how many of these photos show people with tan lines. Nudists have all over tans.

If you are getting sexually excited by looking at these sites, you're either not on a nudist site or you have the wrong idea of what nudism is really about. Go to the real nudist sites listed below, find a place near you and after you've learned all the rules, give it a try for yourself.

2007-03-23 19:12:51 · answer #1 · answered by USAnudist 3 · 0 1

If you're talking about a nudist website and not porn, talking about the lifestyle and looking at photos isn't bad. It's only when you start thinking sexual things while looking does it become wrong. The whole point of a nudist lifestyle is to live as nature intended us. It isn't meant to be sexual at all. That's the image nudists are trying to get away from.

2007-03-23 08:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by chicyuna 5 · 2 2

Its not right or wrong its 1 of them grey areas. Just because a child is nude it is not pornography. If you were to think on that line my parents, your parents and every parent on the planet is guilty of having kiddie porn (except for non camera owning people) since almost everyone makes family photo albums and have been for almost 70 years. every pic of the kid in the tub, potty training or even in the hospital just after birth can be pushed into that category if you think they way you are. Sure some people may get off by viewing these innocent pictures but everyone has their own kinks. Im sure some people out there get horny by looking at pictures of rope, leather, cattle and even kitchen gadgets. does that mean the law will eventually ban websites that show those products? I have no doubt the law will get more screwed up before people say enough is enough, after all if someone breaks into your house and kills off your family before you manage to stop him he can sue you for causing harm to him, is that right? no but its the law.

2016-03-17 01:21:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Naturism is a healthy lifestyle with an appreciation of the freedom nudity can bring. If you are looking at photos for titillation then I think you should go see a shrink and get to bottom of what you really feel about nudity. Society has given most people so many hangups about nudity that they equate nudity with sex. Hopefully you can sort things out and get to enjoy naturism, if you so choose.

2007-03-25 14:37:20 · answer #4 · answered by Marion and Frank L 2 · 0 0

If the reason you are looking is because you are curious about the nudist life, then, no it isn't wrong. If you are looking at it just so that you can look at naked people, then yes. Nudists are such, because they love the freedom. Clothes are binding restrictive and often uncomfortable. They are nudists not exhibitionists. Nudists do not walk around nude so that you (or anyone) can get sexual gratification from looking at them.

2007-03-23 08:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by JORDAN 3 · 3 2

Nudist would prefer to be called Naturalists. If you are looking at it for porn, then it's wrong. But I doubt you'll find much porn on a naturalists website. Adult nudity by itself is not porn.

2007-03-23 09:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by J M 4 · 2 1

You were obviously raised that the body must remain hidden. As a result, you now have a great need to see what was hidden but also the guilt as if doing something wrong.

You are NOT doing anything wrong.

2007-03-26 11:56:01 · answer #7 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 1 0

Nothing at all wrong with it, just like there's nothing wrong with the unclothed human body itself. Like my grandma says, if God meant for us all to go around naked we'd be born that way! It's fun, enjoy ;-)

2007-03-23 10:44:20 · answer #8 · answered by barefoot_always 5 · 1 1

Pornography is still pornography no matter what its form. A good example (if you know your Bible) is Noah. After the flood, for some reason or another, Noah got drunk (some think that it had something to do with the new atmosphere and the grapes, who knows). When he passed out, one of his sons came in and 'looked on his nakedness.' The other two sons came in backwards to cover him up.

The son that looked at his nakedness was cursed because of it ... his children eventually became the Canaanites and the bunch.

Was it wrong to look at his father's nakedness? It seems that it was. That is why I am careful not to show my 'nakedness' (which would have to be defined) in public, or even to my children once they reach a more understanding age.

If it is for pornography reasons, it is that much more the wrong. Perhaps even an addiction?

2007-03-23 08:43:50 · answer #9 · answered by justin singleton 2 · 0 6

Yes I do think is wrong

2007-03-23 08:39:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers