What makes people think that fighting a 'war' in Iraq has prevented terrorist attacks in the US?

Question

The people responsible for planning 9/11 are in Pakistan/Afghanistan.
The so-called 'war' in Iraq is only serving to 'manufacture' more people with grudges against the US.
Let the Iraqis fight their own war.

Answer 1

All true.

Even if there were some terrorists in Iraq, committing the bulk of our troops there doesn't do anything (except weaken us) against the terrorists scatter throughout the rest of the world.

Answer 2

At the time of the invasion, the United States was still in a state of awe from the attacks of 9/11 and were willing to go after anyone who was even remotely assiociated with Bin Ladin, so the US government tied Iraq which had been a tried and true enemy of the US for sometime as a friend to Bin Ladin (even though Sadam and Ladin are of different sects of Islam), in order to take on someone else.
The war in Afghanistan wasn't good enough, it lacked the 'punch' that the US government was looking for, hitting caves with rockets just doesn't have the glitz that blowing up palaces does. Even capturing Bin Ladin lost importance.
However, even if Iraq was a mistake and turned many people against us, it has also created a whole resource rich country that could be used against us. True, it would be nice to just leave the situation and let the Iraq people fight it out but it is too late for that already. You can't just allow a country of that size to spiral into a deeper level of chaos than it already has. By doing this you would just multiply your problem that you have already created.
Instead, since it is too late to stop what has been started, we need to see our mess through to the end even though it will cost soldiers lives and cost tax payers alot of money. Otherwise we are just opening the mainland up for better funded attacks from a country of millions.
We still have support from some of the Iraq people but if we leave than we are bound to create a country more like Iran than a democracy and that is a scary thought.

Answer 3

I was not in favor of going into Iraq for the reasons mentioned like WMD, Iraqi freedom and such. However, the front in the war on terror is Iraq as said by Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri. I agree that Afghanistan was put on the backburner, but will remain an ally in the war on terror. The truth is that there have not been any terrorist attacks on America since 9/11/2001. We are waging war in Iraq to show Infidel Muslims that we are serious about terror and will win if the democratic Congress allows the war to be prosecuted by the president instead of obstructionists. We have killed alot of terrorists and need to kill more of them, This war has been really clean, by that I mean that there is not enough Iraqi people dying to show the strength of the US military. By letting the Iraqi people fight their own war it will grow into a full scale war with the Iranians. If the USA pulled out of Iraq, This would become an even bigger sanctuary for terrorists and terrorist groups like Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa Martyrs, and Islamic Jihad. Syria and Lebanon would go to war again and Israel would be drawn in as well. The Sunnis in Saudi Arabia would take over the southern part of Iraq and control the oil supply. By the Saudis being in Iraq and Iran being there it would grow into a regional war that would make Iraq look like nothing at all. The bigger picture is what you need to focus on here. We are fighting a global war against these people

Answer 4

Well, that's a good question.

One answer is that Iraq is overflowing with men and women, and even children that go blow themselves up and shoot in crowds of innocent people. Now think of Afganistan. They're just a big bunch of terrorists and do what? They control the government. Now imagine a big bunch of people, that kill up to 50 (If someone wants to average it for real, then please do.) people a day because of a God. That would be worst then Afganistan, because it would actually be civil war. The talibans are controling everyone. In Iraq, everyone will be like chickens with their heads cut off. They won't know what to do at all. While the Americans are there, it's impossible for large groups of people to rage war against others, because the Americans are going to stop them before they do.

Answer 5

You misplaced me while you claimed that a meant improvement of the Iraq War used to be a few firms getting a couple of additional dollars. Your reasoning is as an alternative simplistic and foolish. The improvement of waging a War in opposition to Saddam used to be to take away a tyranical dictator from energy. Anyone who claims that Saddam used to be no longer a harborer of terrorism is a idiot. Was it additionally approximately oil? Yes, oil used to be one motive however no longer the one motive. In regards of the oil, it used to be approximately who might have manipulate over the oil within of Iraq. Our govt believed that it used to be within the great curiosity of the arena as a entire that the Iraqi Government (minus Saddam) have manipulate over their oil. Saddam preserving manipulate over that oil and the earnings to support fund his terrorist events in the course of the MiddleEast and probably in opposition to the US at a few factor at some point used to be a main motive for the War. I do not feel your frame of mind is uneducated however I do feel incidentally you made a decision to phrase your ideas you're making an attempt to instigate a war of words which is not what a clever man or woman might do. You do not desire individuals to be insulting to you however you're insulting closer to the intentions of our Country. Sorry, I occur to consider that our Country used to be justified in waging a War in opposition to Saddam for more than one causes.

Answer 6

All I can suggest to answer your question is that by using rational thinking, the war in Iraq MAY NOT be preventing any more attacks in the USA and it may be a coincidence that one has not occurred but I wonder what makes people think that fighting the war in Iraq has not prevented another attack.

Answer 7

The people responsible for planning 9/11 are not only in Pakistan/Afghanistan, but in the white house.

Answer 8

Maybe the fact that Hussein not only harbored terrorists, but also trained them in terrorist training camps. Three of these camps (Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak) were ran by Elite Iraqi military units and took in fighters from terrorist groups that had close ties with Al Qaeda.

These were found in documents that the US found after invading Iraq. Couple that with the fact that Hussein was a lunatic that was terrorizing his own people, and you get a pretty clear idea that if he was willing and able to do it to them, he would probably do it to us if we did nothing.

Answer 9

I agree. I don't know how people got duped into thinking Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. I don't know why it doesn't bother more people that we managed to hang Saddam and his cohorts but we can't even find Osama, the man admittedly responsible for 9/11. Bush pulled the classic bait and switch.

Answer 10

Well, fighting a war in Bosnia prevented any attacks on the WTC from '93 until 9-11.

Answer 11

The war in Iraq attracts those extremists that would otherwise be plotting and planning another attack on the US.

Those that choose to come into Iraq to fight, are usually eliminated with extreme prejudice by American forces. IPSO FACTO, the more extremists eliminated in Iraq, the less there are to plot attacks agains the US.