http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/washington/23immig-q.html
2007-03-23 07:50:57 · 5 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Steddy, if they are adults and heads of families with more than two adults and not old, they would have to walk through a turnstyle at the border. I see this as an insult. I'd rather they spent their energy REALLY addressing true issues.
2007-03-23 08:10:56 · update #1
it's crazy. if they want amnesty so much why don't they let the American people vote on this. hold an elections for it. the govt don't speak for me.
2007-03-23 10:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Making the illegals leave & re-enter would certainly be better than a blanket Amnesty... I have yet to see any bill that would actually work, considering we can't even enforce the laws we have now.
Edit: My bad, my understanding of the bill was that they would have to leave and get on the list just like everyone else. I did not realize that it was just a dog & pony show to cover the technicalities. I just read over the text, and I stand corrected.
2007-03-23 07:56:54 · answer #2 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The bill is a joke. I am livid about them adding an additional 400,000 to 600,000 per year of low wage earners. I would like the government to post these jobs so they can prove to me we need that many more people.
It is so full of loopholes it's not funny.
2007-03-23 08:46:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the ny times is a commie rag...it should be renamed to "the daily worker".....
2007-03-23 07:53:59 · answer #4 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
loretta great idea
2007-03-23 11:31:38 · answer #5 · answered by lone wolfe 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋