Atheism: The claim, belief that there is no God, or disbelief of God?

Question

Well, if it was a belief of no God, then isn't it right that Atheists therefore must believe and try to prove a negative?

And who doesn't know a negative is unprovable?

Then will the conception that states: "Atheism is the belief of no God" be possible?

"Drink!" ? Haha, dumbass

Even Atheists themselves have no idea about their disbelief, unbelievable

I'm stating a misconception about Atheism and breaking it off, people!

This question was aimed at believers who discriminate Atheism, and what do I see here?

Answer 1

Dis Believe - the negation of believe, i.e. to hold no belief in...

Disbelieve doesn't mean to hold the contradictory belief.

There are strong atheists who do hold the positive belief in no god(s), they are in the minority of atheists, though.

p.s. Though a negative is harder to prove, it's not impossible.

I can prove that "There is no god that was born yesterday and has always existed". This is self-contradictory. In those terms, taking the bible literally, that god is provably non-existent. Perhaps with different traits that wouldn't be provable, but that negative currently can be proven.

Answer 2

Atheism as defined by many reliable sources is simply the "lack of belief in a God". Some atheist will outrightly claim "God does not exist", perhaps that is what you mean when you say "there is no God". Others, which perhaps are more correctly labeled agnostic-atheists (myself included), simply state that they don't know, but that they don't believe in a God. It's a difficult thing to nail down, because people across the board differ regarding what "atheism" actually entails.

Answer 3

Atheism is defined as a lack of belief in Gods.

Belief in something is an estimate that the probability of that something is greater than 50%.

Therefore Atheists either have not estimated the probability of Gods or else have estimated the probability as 50% or less.

If Atheists believe there is no god that means they have estimated the probability of gods as less than 50%.

I suspect most atheists have estimated the likelihood of gods and estimate the probability as low, however one cannot assume all atheists have done so.

Answer 4

Atheism is one of two things:

Strong: The active statement of belief or knowledge that there is no deity of any kind.
Weak: The passive lack of belief in a deity of some kind.

And yes, it's impossible to prove a negative -- but the existence of a deity has a necessary consequence that is missing in this universe, which makes it possible to prove, via the contrapositive, that there is no deity.

Answer 5

I suppose the honour you are making is being passive and energetic atheism. Someone who is regarded the proposition that there's anything we will be able to legitimately name a god and rejected it's actively atheist. Someone who is not ever heard of the inspiration is passively atheist. These are 2 specific instances. But many energetic atheists like to assert primacy for his or her ideals through seeing passive atheism because the ordinary, pre-social situation of humanity and conflating this with their possess energetic stance. Historically, the time period 'atheist' arose in a cultural where perception in gods used to be the common default. Prior to the fifth century BCE, 'atheos' intended any one who were deserted through the gods. The gods existed, the deficient 'atheos' believed in them, they might simply grew to become their backs on him for some thing purpose. (Greek devout narrative might be real brutal.) It used to be simplest within the fifth century BCE that 'atheos' took at the form of which means that we are used to at present. But even then it used to be used to denote that any one actively denied a god. Less ordinarily it intended any one who denied all gods. Why much less ordinarily? Because denying all gods used to be very infrequent. Far extra average had been instances like Roman polytheists calling Christians 'atheists' and Christians calling Roman polytheists the identical factor. :-) If contemporary atheists desire an additional phrase to explain their function, they are loose to coin one.

Answer 6

It's the lack of a belief in a god or gods.

And a negative is not unprovable, you're just not trying hard enough.

Answer 7

Strong atheism: God does not exist.
Weak atheism: I do not believe that God exists.

Both are rejections of the claim that God exists, which is the positive claim that must be supported by evidence, and is not.

Answer 8

We are not trying to prove a negative, we are not accepting of a fantasy. Atheism is not a religion to prove or believe in. It is a realization that what christians spew is false. We are looking for a truth, and not accepting your idea of a truth.

Answer 9

Will you stop playing with words! You're going to hurt yourself.

Atheism is a belief in the same fashion as not collecting stamps is a hobby.

Answer 10

Atheism is merely that which is not theism. So it covers both your options. You need more than just "atheist" to understand an atheist's position on theology.