Yeah. I knew that.
Thanks though.
I works if it for wonder sentences.
2007-03-23 04:22:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have seen that said before or similer I could read it with no problem but it seems a bit pointless to deliberatly mix the letters.
2007-03-23 11:23:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mim 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I read the whole thing just perfectly- that's fun! You know what I noticed though- when I read a word that is spelled more than one way and it's spelled the wrong way (as in to, two, too or there, their, they're) it makes it sooooooo hard for me to understand the sentence
2007-03-23 11:25:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Eye gnu that b4 ewe rote it. Sum peeps use it as an xcuze 2 type 7334
2007-03-23 11:22:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've seen that a zillion times before, and the hell of it is, I didn't even *get* that I was reading something badly misspelled until I got to the second line! Yes, I could read it!
2007-03-23 11:23:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by GreenEyedLilo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The human mind is truly a wonderful thing.
It stlil dossen't abslove pepole frrom uisng sppel chek.
2007-03-23 11:22:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dave P 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The researchers at Cambridge have obviously never won any spelling bees.
2007-03-23 11:23:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by TG 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I larnde htat at ym unoin hlal thnaks. It si fnuny
2007-03-23 11:22:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I got an eiaml form my duahgter taht siad the smae tinhg... it semes to be ture...
2007-03-23 11:22:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you are right. I just read that entire question without really stumbling over the grammar. Good one.
2007-03-23 11:21:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7
·
1⤊
1⤋