Can you admit things could exist that aren't explained by cold hard science? Even if is as crazy as UFOs or spirits.I don't mind skeptics because i don't think we should believe everything someone tells us but what if there was extrodinary proof of these things? would you still deny it because your afraid of being wrong or would you admit that there are some things that can't be explained or have a rational explanation.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070322/ts_afp/sciencespaceufo_070322143210
2007-03-23 03:10:02 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Of course I will admit that things exist that are not explained by science. But if a thing is not explained by science, how can there be any sort of "proof" for it? What would be a non-scientific "proof"?
In any case, when there is a thing that is not explained, I will live with it for the moment. I can stand unanswered questions. I do not need unfounded fantasy answers.
2007-03-23 03:33:54 · answer #1 · answered by NaturalBornKieler 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact of the matter is, very few scientists would dispute that alien life may exist.
The universe is so vast that it's unlikely that we inhabit the only planet upon which life developed.
It is, however, highly improbable that it was all created by (a) God.
This article does not provide "extrodinary proof" [sic] that any of the UFO sightings were actually of alien craft.
2007-03-23 03:19:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anthony Stark 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Skeptics can easily admit that they might be wrong.
It's the non-skeptics that refuse to.
Just post a question here. Ask any of the Christians if they will admit the possibility that they are wrong. They won't even contemplate such a thing.
And that's why we skeptics look at them with such amusement. Their foolishness is hard not to laugh at.
2007-03-23 03:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Evolutin is a fact and theory, I'm no skeptic. If there were evidence that one of the many deities started evolution, I'd listen, but there is not.
Most scientists strongly believe in the possibility of life on other planets. They have for some time, there are billions of stars, very high probability of life elsewhere. Nothing to do with spirits...
2007-03-23 03:14:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm so sceptical I was born in a tank, but I believe in all sorts of things that can't be explained by cold, hard science.
There's nothing "extrodinary" about that...
2007-03-23 03:27:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I can admit that there are things which could be unknowable to us through science, but even those things would still follow the laws of physics. For example, there could be other universes and it's quite possible that we can never confirm that.
2007-03-23 03:13:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't extraordinary proof necessitate an explanation?
2007-03-23 03:25:05 · answer #7 · answered by Murazor 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it's true that a wise person know that he knows nothing, then I'm a frickin' GENIUS! ;-)
I do believe in God, but I know I could be wrong. I'm not inclined to believe in UFOs, but I again know that I could be proven wrong.
In short, I don't know Jack Schitt. ;-)
2007-03-23 03:19:24 · answer #8 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,
there are plenty of things that can't be explained.
i don't understand why the universe is the universe.
mabe when there is no rational answer for things its just that we haven't found it yet.
we are not special we are just human
2007-03-23 03:18:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Skeptics have no trouble admitting that things COULD exist.
But we like evidence before we accept that they DO.
2007-03-23 03:14:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋