I have found:
a paciscor abunde a paciscor
a paciscor est a paciscor
I am not sure if these are correct. Can any latin majors out there help?
Thanks!
2007-03-23 02:49:08 · 5 answers · asked by sam e 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
"Pactum pactum est" appears to be spot on.
"Transactio" has been suggested, in which case it would have to be "transactio transactio est."
2007-03-23 03:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Transactio transactio est.
Paciscor is a verbal form not a noun.
It comes from the deponent verb
"paciscor, pacisci, pactus sum" and it's
the first person of the present indicative
in the passive form. It can't translate 'deal'.
All on-line translators are hardly working if
used to translate sentences in any language,
but are a total disaster if used for Latin...!!
Edit #1 -
As a further proposal I would write
SPONSUS SPONSUS EST (Wedding promise)
Edit #2 -
Re. "transactionem" I've corrected it into the suggested nominative "transactio". I had forgotten the rule of the predicate nominative :) Sorry !!.
2007-03-23 09:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by martox45 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Just like English (bargain, pact, agreement, contract) there are many words that could mean 'deal'. Some are:
Foedus - more like treaty; deal between states
Pactio - bargain; agreement
Transactio - business agreement; negotiated settlement
Pactum - bargain; agreement
Condicio - agreement; contract; terms; also marriage contract
Regardless of choice of word, the construction would be;
Pactio pactio est
Condicio condicio est
and so on. The first 'deal' is the subject and must be in nominative case. The second 'deal' is a predicate nominative, and must also be in nominative case.
2007-03-24 10:37:01 · answer #3 · answered by dollhaus 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Un trato es un trato. thats in spanish
a paciscor est a paciscor. that is :Latin
try this link below in the future.
2007-03-23 09:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by sam 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
dealus es dealus.
2007-03-23 09:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋