Wow, I can not believe anyone is still interested in OJ. Dont you know he is searching every Golf Course in Florida for the real killers?
2007-03-23 02:31:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Oh please, OJ did it and the evidence is iron-clad. The fact that a jury filled with morons could not understand what DNA was kept him from being convicted.
Some facts:
1. OJ's blood was found both at the scene, as well as in a mixture with the victims blood in his own vehicle. The chances that this DNA was from someone else would be astronomical.
2. Do innocent people flee when they are about to be questioned? Of course not. OJ did.
3. When in custody, OJ had a suspicious cut on his finger which he had trouble explaining.
4. While during the initial trial the Defense team made a good show about the Bruno Magli shoes not being OJ's (or the gloves) They are later seen, and used in his civil trial, in a photo taken while he was a commentator for a major network.
OJ killed two people in a fit of rage, and got away because of brainless jurors.
3.
2007-03-23 02:40:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eric K 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think you will find "official reports" regarding his case other than those from the trial itself. Plenty of speculation, but nothing considered official outside the case presented during the trial.
Perhaps you can find the Goldman's official website?
The OJ Simpson trial that was conducted & televised circa 1994 was merely an Earthly trial led by humans using America's laws. It was the best we could do, given our propensity for making errors both large & small.
Mr. Simpson's R-E-A-L judgment comes later.........
2007-03-24 03:16:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kentucky Dave 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the detectives had not been so ******* racist and out to attraction to close a movie star., they might have gained a seek warrant it fairly is needed via regulation, to flow into the abode of a suspect and seek, plus eliminate data. i'm very plenty into crime & secret agent video clips, and not in any respect in my existence have I seen or examine a case the place the full criminal gadget, inclusive of the forensic team screwed up a case that allowed a murderer to stroll being got here across "not to blame". (Why do you think of all of them supply up their jobs and went into some thing else??). I continuously believed that Oj, and his son dedicated the crime jointly. while the call got here down, to on the present time I undergo in recommendations being on accountability in a wellness middle (won't call), the place an entire scale rebellion broke out between the white docs and the black docs. (i'm speaking an certainly fist combat). maximum human beings of black human beings felt he replaced into not quilty and maximum human beings of white human beings felt he replaced into high quality. my own own opinion each individual who had a hand interior the proseution of Oj, Simson might desire to be charged with first degree homicide X 2 for failing to do the interest that they took and have been paid to accomplish. because of the fact of those ********, 2 human beings are ineffective and Oj, enjoys existence being a loose guy. Minddoctor, France
2016-10-19 10:10:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i was living in L.A. at the time.and as a former police officer i can tell you that unrelated fingerprints are often found at the scene of a crime. few crime scenes are sterile at the time of the crime. to my knowledge there were no other fingerprints discovered by the L.A.P.D. that were considered to be of any relevance to the identification of another suspect. in my opinion, and the opinion of many others,O.J.walked because of sloppy police work. nothing more, nothing less.
2007-03-23 02:41:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Read Clarence Dardin's book
It tell of a lot of evidence that was suppressed from the trial
including O J's Blood at crime scene
2007-03-23 02:31:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe they belonged to ron and nicole. That proves his innocence.
2007-03-23 02:31:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
who cares?? OJ is old, get over it
2007-03-23 04:24:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by HU4L 2
·
1⤊
0⤋