English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

They don't! They won't even get involved if there is no money to be had!

2007-03-23 00:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by earl justice 3 · 0 0

There are numerous successes that the UN have performed because of the fact it replaced into formed. It has peacefully negotiated 172 peace settlements that have ended close by conflicts. The U.N. has been in touch in each substantial conflict and international disaster on account that its inception and has served as a catalyst for the prevention of others. It approved the international coalitions that fought interior the Korean conflict (1950-fifty 3) and the Persian Gulf conflict (1991). It offered a communicate board for mediation interior the Arab - Israeli conflict ensuing in quite a few peace accords and preserving the conflict localized to the middle East. for the duration of the Cuban Missile disaster in 1962, the U.N. replaced into used as a podium via united states of america to project the Soviet Union’s placement of nuclear missiles in Cuba. The embarrassment of public indictment replaced into instrumental in forcing the Soviets to eliminate the missiles. U.N. militia forces (offered via member states) have carried out over 35 peacekeeping missions offering risk-free practices and lowering armed conflict. In 1988, the U.N. Peace-preserving Forces gained the Nobel Prize for Peace. The U.N. has additionally set up conflict crimes tribunals to attempt conflict criminals interior the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. There are nevertheless alot of issues that the U.N has performed yet human beings in basic terms verify out the risks instead of the helpful ones.

2016-10-19 10:03:30 · answer #2 · answered by scafuri 4 · 0 0

Ineffectively, because of the UN Security Council. The 5 permanent members have veto powers on all issues. It's rare that all 5 are agreeable on any issue. The resolution of any conflict seems possible only if the 5 have major stakes in the political outcome.

2007-03-23 00:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by gone 6 · 0 0

United Nations is the biggest joke around.There is not one conflict they resolved that the hostilities ended.

2007-03-23 00:29:12 · answer #4 · answered by Richard D 2 · 0 0

Korea?.....only a ceasefire
Cyprus?....island is still divided
Mauritania?....still divided
Congo?....still in conflct
Rwanda?....couldn't stop a massacre that killed more people per month than what the Nazis could do
Sinai?....only fixed when the Israelis and Egypt forged their own peace
Bosnia?....nothing happened until the West intervened in Kosovo
Timor?....nothing happened until Australia intervened

2007-03-23 03:58:30 · answer #5 · answered by Mardy 4 · 1 0

Toothlessly!

2007-03-23 00:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Observation, arbitration, mediation, propaganda, intellectual pressures, and, in rare cases, sanctions (trade) -- not use of force, any more! Basically, it's all counselling on that plane!

2007-03-23 00:19:26 · answer #7 · answered by swanjarvi 7 · 0 0

They should but they don't. The USA has cut the UN into a puppet with no impact.

2007-03-23 00:27:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Poorly.....

2007-03-23 01:57:51 · answer #9 · answered by Carpe diem 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers