Issue Cost
1. Communism $13.1 Trillion
2. War on Terror $455 billion
Who would benefit from such spending?
Democracy has fallen to plutocracy.
Accenture Ltd.
Aerojet
Aerospace Center Support
Aerospace Corporation
Alliant Techsystems
Allied-Signal Inc.
AM General Corporation
American Petroleum Institute
Anteon International Corporation
Applied Research Associates Inc.
Argon ST
BAE Systems plc (U.S. subsidiary is BAE Systems Inc.)
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Ball Corporation
Bath Iron Works
Battelle Memorial Institute
BBN Technologies
Bechtel Corporation
Bell Helicopter (division of Textron)
BDM Corporation
Blazeware Inc.
Boeing Company
Boeing Sikorsky Comanche Team
Boeing SVS
Booz Allen Hamilton
Brashear (owned by Nextel)
British Nuclear Fuels Limited
CACI International Inc.
Carlyle Group
Carnegie Mellon University
Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
CNA Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
CSA Engineering
Computer Sciences Corporation
Decibel Research Inc.
DHB Industries
Digital System Resources Inc.
DynCorp
Edison Welding Institute
EDO Corporation
Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Electric Boat (division of General Dynamics)
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Evergreen International Aviation
Exxon Corporation
F M C Technologies
Foster Wheeler Ltd.
Foundation Health Systems Inc.
Gemini Industries Inc.
General Atomic Technologies Company
General Dynamics
General Electric's Military Jet Engines Division
Geo-Centers Inc.
Goodrich Corporation
GTE
Georgia Tech Research Institute
Halliburton Company
Harris Corporation
Health Net, Inc.
Hewlett-Packard
Honeywell
Hughes Electronics Corporation
Humana Inc.
IBM
Institute for Defense Analyses
Intelsat
International Resources Group
ITT Corporation Inc.
ITT Research Institute
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Johns Hopkins University Inc.
JPS Communications (wholly owned subsidiary of Raytheon)
Kaman Aircraft
Kearfott Guidance & Navigation Corporation
Kellogg, Brown and Root
Kollsman Inc.
Kongsberg Protech
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
Lockheed Martin
Longbow Limited Liability Inc.
Loral Corp.
Maersk Line and Patriot Contract Services
Marconi Corporation PLC
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Maytag Aircraft Corporation
McDonnell Douglas Corporation (wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing)
MEVATEC Corporation
Mission Research Corporation
MITRE Corporation; also see ANSER Institute for Homeland Security
Mitretek Systems Inc.; see MITRE Corporation and ANSER Institute for Homeland Security
Mitsubishi
Motorola Inc.
NASSCO Holdings Inc.
Nextel
Nichols Research Corporation
NLX Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
Northrop Grumman Information Technologies
Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
Northrop Grumman Newport News (formerly Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Company)
Northrop Grumman Ships Systems
Northrop Grumman Space Technology
Northrop Grumman Technical Services
Ocean Shipholdings Inc.
Olin Corporation; also see John M. Olin and John M. Olin Foundation
Orbital Sciences Corporation
Pennsylvania State University
Pratt & Whitney (division of United Technologies)
Private Military Corporations
Private Federal Corporations
Quantum3D
Raytheon
Rockwell International
RONCO (de-mining operations Horn of Africa)
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
Shell Oil Company
Siemens AG
Sikorsky Aircraft Company
SPARTA, Inc.
Spectrum Astro
SRI International
Standard Missile Company LLC
Stevedoring Services of America
Stewart and Stevenson
Sverdrup Corporation
Talla-Tech
TCom
Texas Instruments Inc.
Textron Inc.
The Titan Corporation
Tyco International Ltd.
University of Texas System
Unisys Corporation
United Industrial Corporation
United Technologies
URS Corporation
USmax Corporation
Verdian Corporation
Verizon Communications
Vinnell Corporation
Vinnell Brown and Root
Washington Group International
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Worldcorp Inc.
Wyvern Technologies, Aerospace & Defense Contractors
Why would all these defense contractors wish the war to stop? War stops demand for arms decreases. Dont take my word for it take the word of President Eisenhower in his farewell address .
2007-03-22 20:03:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why bomb Iran?
The Russians pulled out of their nuclear deal with Iran this week because they have not been paid in several months. Some people speculate it is actually because of pressure from the west.
Story from the Nasdaq website.
Russia Delays Indefinitely Opening Of Iranian Nuclear Reactor
Tuesday, Russia announced that it was postponing indefinitely the opening of Iran's already delayed nuclear power plant as Tehran has failed to make timely payments.
The announcement followed the breakdown of three days of talks last week to settle a disagreement over payments. The move comes as the six major powers indicated that a draft resolution on imposing further new sanctions against the Islamic republic over its nuclear defiance was imminent.
Last week, the Atomstroiexport company announced its decision not to send its nuclear experts to Iran to complete the Bushehr nuclear power plant over non-payment. The Russians was to deliver the nuclear fuel for it this month.
A statement from Atomstroiexport said the project would be delayed indefinitely.
"The time frame has been moved and so the launch cannot happen in September. We simply cannot do it," a spokeswoman for the company said adding "If we cannot launch the station in September, then we cannot deliver the fuel according to the old timetable either."
The Russians claim the Iranians have paid only a fraction of the $US25 million a month needed to cover construction costs.
2007-03-22 19:29:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Bush is not afraid. Instead he is simply following an integrated strategy against Iran that 1) has effectively neutralized Iran militarily; 2) has Iran isolated diplomatically; and 3) is strangling Iran's economy.
Just because President Bush does not do the Clinton-style useless but highly visible cruise missile attacks - does not mean that he is not dealing with the problem.
2007-03-23 03:01:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran is dangerous and must be treated seriously by the Bush administration before an attack has been launched that is too late for the Americans to react just like what happened on 9/11.
2007-03-22 19:25:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even if the white house wanted to go to war with Iran, they would succeed. We do not have the necessary men equipment and money to do so. It is impossible. The only reason Iran is dangerous is becasue mr bush took out saddam who kept him in check. We do not have the army to taske out Iran. Although if isreal was attacked, you bet the U.S. would get the permission to finish the Iranian military off. In a nutshell were bogged down in Iraq, Afghanistan and couldnt pull it off. At the same time were trying to better our relation with te world and another war would put us in the worst position since hitler.
And NOOO it doesnt justify war becasue we went to war with the damn wrong people. The people who crashed into the WTC were not from Iran or Afghanistan. Bush just wanted to sway the public for his agenda--Iraq...
2007-03-22 19:36:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joseph 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
ts media that's creates fear in the mind of people through out society in a way of creating hate towards fellow man through video ,music and TV .Its economic progress that's stops the bomb as who wants a country that is un live-able through the means of terror .Calling people pigs makes no difference .Its positive reinforcement through good intent in the media and TV that will also stop the fear of threat and will create a terror free society Its not communist to have positive reinforcement through media outlets to even stop the threat of children picking guns and taking them to schools or streets to kill the innocent .The people at the negotiating tables are the ones that must have good intent to understand what other people as saying as different races talk differently and express themselves different as well .Back in the 50's everybody had there nicknames and way of talking through what was around them as some people of today still talk like this .So what I'm talking about is to stop the threat of war understand your country then you can understand others country's and customs .No politician should fear custom but embrace it as teaches what is wrong and is also an others teachings.
2007-03-22 20:17:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have to ask yourself what does Israel want out of all this really. What is their agenda. I know they are stacked here in the good old USA. We see quite clearly what they did to Lebanon. So do we play follow the leader here or do we lead. With all do respect to Saudi Arabia, and our friends in the middle east. We need a genuine pow wow a group hug. A get together maybe a cocktail party! This is a great country I hate to see it go to hell because of bad leadership, and grown men thinking only about themselves.
2007-03-22 19:49:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by mr bliss 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you'll discover that if push comes to shove, Mr. Bush will react as strongly as Jack Kennedy did. A coward he ain't.
2007-03-22 21:17:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
some times people need to be evaluated for their mental health, perhaps that can reveal what he is really afraid of or its just a mushroom over his celebral
2007-03-22 21:06:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by blitzkrieg_hatf6 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
its not about bush , if it were up to bush he would nuke em all, its the pansy dem. who would rather cut funds and run. here is a taught .WW1 We were never attacked inside the u.s ,WW2 we were never attacked. Vietnam we were never attacked. 911 we were attacked . does that justify WAR??
2007-03-22 19:35:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
war is the last option
2007-03-22 22:01:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋