English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If it's not there how does science explain it exists?

HELP ME PLEASE!!!!!!!!

2007-03-22 16:03:19 · 13 answers · asked by Kiss these 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

There's millions of them.

You yourself are a transitional form. Every being that ever lived on this planet or is living on this planet now was or is a transitional form.

2007-03-22 16:06:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
Which evolved first (how, and how long; did it work without the others)?
The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.)?
The drive to reproduce or the ability to reproduce?
The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
The termite or the flagella in its intestines that actually digest the cellulose?
The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants?
The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones?
The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system?
The immune system or the need for it?
There are many thousands of examples of symbiosis that defy an evolutionary explanation. Why must we teach students that evolution is the only explanation for these relationships?
How would evolution explain mimicry? Did the plants and animals develop mimicry by chance, by their intelligent choice, or by design?

2007-03-22 16:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by the great one 4 · 2 0

"Missing link" is a term from creationist propaganda organizations. It's pretty easy to understand - it's a story that creationists tell to confuse gullible people so that they reject science.

As archangel (above) points out, the simplest cell is FAR too complex to have been the product of intelligent design. The creationists simply don't seem to understand how difficult that design task would be.

2007-03-22 16:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YOULL be looking forever cus if the links missing and you already dont believe in anything or anyone how will u ever find it?

2007-03-22 16:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by Spirited 3 · 0 0

The most simple cell is exponentially more complicated than the most complex machine man has ever made. I hope this helps.

2007-03-22 16:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 0 0

there is no "missing link" between apes an humans today. anyone looking for one is foolish. humans evolved from an ape-like animal millions of years ago.

2007-03-22 16:24:58 · answer #6 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 1 0

You know trying to "explain" something to fit your theory isn't science.

2007-03-22 16:07:18 · answer #7 · answered by JumpingJoy 2 · 3 0

I am a Bigfoot .do i need to say anymore? OK then.
its is rather obvious though.
Were the original walking primate,
Y'all are the result of lonely aliens mating with chimps.
they now come take your children to be there slaves
So now you now

2007-03-22 16:07:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

As a Christian who is kind to atheists I just tell them to say the truth. "It''s still missing and we are still looking for them".

2007-03-22 17:34:13 · answer #9 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 0 1

Which link do you think is missing, exactly? There are dozens of different early human and pre-human fossils.

2007-03-22 16:06:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers