Here is an example. In Georgia's Lake Hiwaassee, one species of trout existed before the TVA deepened the lake, in the 1970.
when i fished in the shallows, in 1972,i found trout that had a flatter shape, on the underbelly. Close to the shore.
My uncle fished in deeper ends of the lake and caught trout that had a V shapped bottom.
The two trouts were the same species once, as none had been introduced into the lake.
Now, they are classified as 2 distinct species as they dont interbreed.
Now is this evolution, or not?
2007-03-22 10:37:00 · 3 answers · asked by rss_beatty 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That is not evidence for evolution. If anything, it could be gender, or choice of habitat by the fish. One caught in the shallows and one in deeper water. Scientist are really aggressive when it comes to "classifying" new species. Isn't it still a trout? We seem the same thing in bugs. Those who have more moisture and food seem to develop differently from those who don't. People see what they want to, including scientist.
2007-03-22 10:48:09 · answer #1 · answered by Mr Marc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are still trout. Like birds of the same kind breed. This is not evolution. Evolution is one species changing into another kind of species. God says that every creature that He created, reproduces after it's own kind.
Birds stay birds, fish stay fish, insects stay insects, trees stay trees, monkeys stay monkeys and humans stay humans.
2007-03-22 10:51:51 · answer #2 · answered by 4HIM- Christians love 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution makes more sense than creationism. The God of the Bible is so limited, evolution could not be a part of "his plan".
Many other religions do support evolution as a possibility.
2007-03-22 10:42:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋