...scientific evidence and anecdotal evidence? See the answers to my previous question about scientific proof that they used to be Christians.
2007-03-22 08:23:18 · 10 answers · asked by jinxmchue001 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
we all take the evidence and mold it top fit what we already believe. You can't get around that. Today's scientists are getting federal funding to do just that!
We all do that, no exceptions, just some of us do it more than others.
2007-03-22 08:32:03 · answer #1 · answered by Real Friend 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what is the difference between scientific and anecdotal evidence? Enlighten us. You tell us we don't know because we're atheist, and yet we have no explaination from you.
2007-03-22 08:36:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are in the wrong here:
You need to provide the operationalization of Christian BEFORE scientific evidence can be provided.
Please bear in mind that an operational definition will include the testing criteria.
2007-03-22 08:32:14 · answer #3 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the same mentality that would lead someone else to equate the phrase "I don't understand" with "god did it".
If you want scientific proof of my former christianity, you can send me the money to have a very large Confirmation picture scanned for you.
2007-03-22 08:28:54 · answer #4 · answered by billthakat 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
See my reply to your question!
In asking for "scientific" evidence for an historical occurance, you are coming very close to making an error of category.
2007-03-22 08:28:04 · answer #5 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
this is a great question! I too have faith in micro evolution. i think that macro evolution is punctiliously absurd. i think of that this is totally obvious based on the uncomplicated actuality that species evolve and adapt to their atmosphere even even though it has in no way been shown that one species developed into yet another it is precisely what the "concept of Evolution" tries to stress every physique to have faith. If macro evolution is real, why have no "lacking hyperlinks" been got here upon? Species adapt yet do not evolve into new species.
2016-11-27 22:52:38 · answer #6 · answered by myland 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I answered that question. I'm not a Christian, but I didn't say that my ancestry were not because I have no clue. My religion was founded only in the 6th century, I think.
2007-03-22 08:29:31 · answer #7 · answered by R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm still waiting for you to scientifically prove that you don't masturbate.
Quid pro Quo, they call it.
2007-03-22 08:27:29 · answer #8 · answered by Malcolm Knoxville V 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
... and I get hammered for having a lack of a sense of humor? Sheesh.
_()_
2007-03-22 08:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by vinslave 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
They were probably too busy laughing at you.
2007-03-22 08:26:26 · answer #10 · answered by Some Dude 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋