"i heard that you believe "the man came from monkeys" as the thoery of evolution claims..."
Bzzt. Sorry, you're hopelessly wrong already.
Learn about the topic before challenging it, okay? You have made absolutely zero effort here, which clearly shows that you're not interested in learning the truth.
2007-03-22 05:58:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
This is 20 answer that says "Evolution does not disprove the existence of God". What it means is that Creation as outlined in either of the 2 versions in Genesis did not happen, this implies that the infallible word of god is wrong in the beginning. Add in no proof or even a shred of evidence for the global flood and you have a second strike. The third strike comes quickly at the exodus which might possibly have some evidence, if one stretches enough, to possible be rooted in some real event that was nothing like what was described in the Bible.
So, evolution doesn't disprove God, but it and other inconsistencies definitely cast a strong doubt on what is supposed to be an infallible guide.
2007-03-22 13:11:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok so they would say we came from the same place not monkeys themselves, seeing as it didnt happen it doesnt really matter. it cant really disprove it any more than it can prove itself, evolution has more holes than a block of swiss cheese, they would have us believe in the oscilating universe theory, or that we are in a cycle of the universe explanding and collapsing and beginning again. 1. this was only a poor attempt to get God out of the picture and 2. this was made in hopes that it could show an infinite past and an infinite future when in reality it had to have a creation date, however they were 1/2 right it does show an infinite future just didnt have what they hoped, an infinite past.
I would like to mention though, that the bible itself says that evolution couldnt have happened. in Genesis 1 it says that in the new and perfect world that there was no sin, no death or destruction. evolution is all about a struggle for existance or really kill or be killed. Since God says he made man in fully human form, theistic evolution or God inspired evolution would have placed this all before the fall of adam, which again the bible says didnt happen.
2007-03-24 14:45:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by supratuner9 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off, the theory of evolution does not say that we came from monkeys. This claim has been made millions of times by people who never read the book.
The theory explains how life began from the tinyest cell and little by little, over millions of years became what you see today. The church said it was all done in seven days. They can't both be right.
If God created evolution. He created something that requires billoins of years to come about. Again, the church says that God just hokus--pokus and there it all was. You have to believe one or the other.
2007-03-22 13:08:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Evolutionary theory has never said that man came from monkeys. It did say that because of the similarities between the two spcies, that it was likely that ape and man had a common ancestor.
Most creationists blame Charles Darwin for the theory of evolution. Actually, the theories of evolution and Natural selection both predated Darwin by about 50 years. Darwin realized in his studies of the unique species of the Galapagos Islands, that the theories were not contra and exclusive of each other, but actually supported each other.
The only major flaw in Darwinism, is the concept of an ultimate species and the belief that mankind is that ultimate species. Natural selection holds that the more adaptable a species is to it's environment, the more prolific it will be in that environment. Man does not adapt to his environment, he adapts his environment to him.
2007-03-22 13:42:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Niklaus Pfirsig 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dear!You still little to differentiate that an atheist is not supposed to be a propounder of evolution theory definitely.Evolution theory as propounded by Darwin negate the existence of a God who has created the universe in entirity but presumes that every chance conducive for evolution of life occurred by itself.Unfortunately the the probability of such an interconnecting chance are theorically so remote that one has to think that it was a guided evolution to achieve the desired ends.The idea of evolution is correct in general but may be inconsist at relatively minor details;Quran is emphatically suggesting such type of guided evolution.
2007-03-30 06:49:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by shahinsaifullah2006 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I believe that they can co-exist. God might have pushed towards evolution. So having evolved from a common thread, god perhaps pushed mankind a little further to be created in his image.
Or something like that. Please don't flame me or anything, but I'm not sure if Genesis tells how god created man in his image... I may be wrong of course.
2007-03-22 13:05:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ned No D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. We cannot disprove the existence of god.
2. Evolution doesn't disprove the existence of god, but it does disprove the biblical tales of Adam and Eve, the Garden of Eden and that the earth was created in 6 days, about 6,000 years ago.
2007-03-22 12:58:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Morey000 7
·
9⤊
0⤋
My religion is the Baha'i Faith. It was founded in the 1800s and our scripture accepts evolution as fact. Science and religion are seen as two ways of looking at reality, and there's no reason why they can't be in agreement.
Genesis does not have a scientific explanation of creation because the average person was not interested in science at the time it was written.
2007-03-30 06:20:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by majnun99 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution does not disprove God. Instead, it just helps us understand how God brought everything into being.
2007-03-22 13:04:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋