If animals have a conscience, it certainly isn't the same as humans. A grizzly bear or lion can attack another animal and eat it. It doesn't debate this issue morally first. It doesn't do it out of rage and they don't feel bad and commit suicide afterwards. They are simply animals being animals. So why did humans evolve this heavy burden of a conscience, compassion, and another mixes of emotions? If we are truly animals and our only point in life is to be born, eat, procreate to keep the species going, then die and become worm food....what benefit would having these emotions serve us? In fact, wouldn't they be detrimental to the expansion of our species? Darwin was correct about survival of the fittest with animals. Mothers will often abandon their weak children to better feed the strong and it is not upsetting to them, but humans dont do this. When a mother murders or abandons their child it isnt seen as sick because society says so, something emotional deep and emotional gets us
2007-03-22
03:19:10
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Matt
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality