also with other 3 adopted kids fr other country......
how would this 4 kids grow? what can you comment on that?
2007-03-22 02:56:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
They have 2 loving parents so what's the problem? Stop being so judgmental.
2007-03-22 03:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Nowadays, this is all a common lifestyle..They may all become curious later on as to why none of them look alike, but that can be dealt with love..kids need love, a stable and secure union of parents, so even if the parents are unmarried, I think it is still possible to offer this to children, because I have seen married couples who don't have it together, and they are dysfunctional at times also..so who is to say which is the "right" way??
2007-03-22 03:05:26 · answer #2 · answered by angeleyes 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's the problem. She has three kids by herself one with brad. They love each other and they love their kids. They can give those kids more than anybody could. Who the hell cares if they get married. This is the year 2007 not 1957. Please catch up with the times. Not every couple has to get married if they want kids. Angelina Jolie had two of the kids before she ever started seeing Brad Pitt. So get off your high horse and give them some freakin privacy. now a days every family is different some families are traditional mom and dad and brother and sister. Some mom and dad are divorced. and some like Rosie O' Donnell's family has two mom's. So get with the times and let's realize that even though they are celebrities they still deserve privacy for their kids
2007-03-22 03:55:10 · answer #3 · answered by Danielle W 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It gets worse than that. no longer all Christians are like this, yet after i became born, my mom stated that she and my dad have been married by using a magistrate. some stupid little Christian lady in her workplace stated out loud that by way of fact of that, i became illegitimate. My mom invited her to the vehicle parking zone. The little stupid lady referred to as to the union representative 'reason she became hard artwork and mom became administration. The union rep had heard the remark and instructed her, "Honey, you're on your very own for this one." authentic tale. i've got talked to a witness who became there on the time. She shown it. This insult got here from a follower of the religion in keeping with somebody who became claimed to be the appropriate Forgiver. yet some idiots truthfully believe that the sins of the mummy and father carry on with to the youngsters. yet they ignore related to the desires of the Prophet Esdras (part of the Apocrypha). you're no longer tainted by using what all and sundry else does yet your self, in case you carry on with the desires of Esdras. until now I grew to become an atheist i became a Methodist and truthfully studied the Bible. Illegitimacy is a factor of the stupid stupid stupid concept that the sins of the mummy and father are carried by using the child.
2016-12-15 06:16:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather those kids get adopted by unmarried parents than stay in an orphanage getting subpar care.
2007-03-22 05:59:42 · answer #5 · answered by SassySours 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think they will grow up just fine in a loving home with good parents who can spoil the hell out of them. Even though they aren't married makes no difference. They would be loved the same if they were married. Don't look down on them because of that. Me and my b/f are not married and we have a 3 month old son together. I love my son and my b/f. Just because we don't have that title don't mean anything. You're jsut being a martyr.
2007-03-22 03:55:26 · answer #6 · answered by lovemuffin 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well 1st off they are a Star actoress' children and they will make out just fine.. think about what kind of life they would have had without her adopting them. I think it is 100% better.. don't you? Look at Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn.. they were never married and their children turned out just fine.. they will be ok.
2007-03-22 04:00:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know that those children were living in orphanages, but I am still sorry to see the life they will lead.
I think the Aniston-Pitt-Jolie triangle is disgusting. It is hard to believe that Aniston and Pitt would split without Jolie as a factor, since Pitt and Jolie hooked up so soon. Even if it is as much Pitt's fault as Jolie's, I can't even fathom being in a relationship with a man who has hurt another woman like he did. So I am no longer a Jolie fan.
Additionally, having that child out of wedlock with no intention of creating a stable marriage at any point is unkind. And the idea of having a multicultural family might be nice, but these kids are going to be stared at because they are such a hodgepodge family. Not to mention, the way Jolie is acting, she is just collecting exotic children like some people collect exotic pets or exotic antiques. It is not right.
We can only hope that the kids turn out all right and manage to have a good life despite their parents.
2007-03-22 03:06:23 · answer #8 · answered by tertiahibernica 3 · 3⤊ 7⤋
I think that all 4 kids will grow up just fine. Who cares if her parents aren't married? It really doesn't make a difference. What matters is that your in a good and loving home. Whether your with your biological parents or not, whether or not their married.
2007-03-22 03:07:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
That isn't anyone's concern besides for the parents that are both raising them. They could do a lot worse then having two parents that live together, raise them together but aren't married to each other.
2007-03-22 03:02:46 · answer #10 · answered by Miriam Z 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think if they are such concerned parents they should make the legal committment and marry. Everyone is so casual about having kids these days but it is a life long job and should not start out with unmarried partners.
2007-03-22 03:04:20 · answer #11 · answered by Maria b 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋