English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please can someone explain the system where this DS chap has it put into his head that he would like to go to a show, then to stay in a hotel, not just a normal place but a 5 star hotel. Yet he is not allowed to take his auntie out to do exactly the same thing on him?!! She has to pay herself!!

I can understand that there has to be a person inbetween calling the shots however when it is for their own self gratification surely there is something wrong with it.

Another carer told the two DS chaps who share accomodation that they should get Sky tv, they organised it and now the carer sits and watches sky tv?!!!

Wat is wrong with our society that this is allowed to go on. My friend has tried to talk to the boss of the carers involved but unfortunately nothing seems to be done and she is being made out to be a trouble maker. Who can she go to to sort this out?

2007-03-22 02:25:01 · 8 answers · asked by KANGA 3 in Society & Culture Etiquette

Unfortunately that has already just taken place and now the carers are suggesting a holiday to Spain!!!!

2007-03-22 08:44:48 · update #1

8 answers

I would call government resources and so on. Go over the heads of the carers supervisors. I think this is a severe case of taking advantage of your friend.
Those carers need to find a new job, scrubbing floors somewhere.

--That Cheeky Lad

2007-03-22 14:29:14 · answer #1 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 0 0

This is absolutely shocking and your friend should see what she can do about getting replacement care for her nephew. What does it matter if some incompetant manager brands her a trouble maker she is doing it for the welfare of her nephew.

She should do what she can to cancel this trip because no one requires a five star hotel let alone ripping off a disabled man to pay for it

2007-03-22 07:35:06 · answer #2 · answered by Lady Claire - Hates Bigotry 6 · 0 0

First port of call is to ask the care commision to investigate.
Also speak to the social work department
I'm no expert on DS , but could it not be the individual's decision?
I would also speak to the legal appointee of the person.
Great to see my tax dollar being spent on 5* hotels LOL

2007-03-23 10:42:07 · answer #3 · answered by ALLEN B 5 · 0 0

what's all of this goofy stuff approximately human beings being "mad" at Sarah Palin for not coaching her daughter start administration or abstinance? you have not have been given the vaguest thought what those mothers and fathers taught their babies! a number of you're so hypocritical and self righteous! have you ever in no way performed something which you relatively knew extra useful than to do? nicely, i can admit that I even have. now and lower back, while that "something" is having intercourse, you get pregnant. Doing ANY element does not advise which you do not understand extra useful or weren't taught extra useful. It in basic terms capacity which you exercised your humanity and made a incorrect or unwise determination! To examine all of this blather approximately "professional-determination" is nauseating. as quickly as a woman is pregnant she isn't handling merely "her very own physique" Her "determination" to have intercourse has resulted interior the existence of yet another person. That person in basic terms has one shot at existence and why absolutely everyone thinks they have the main magnificent to take it away is strategies-boggling! She might desire to then have the "determination" to the two enhance the toddler or permit somebody else do it.being pregnant and permitting that toddler to stay to tell the story does not smash a womans existence!!!! Abortion, on the different hand ENDS someones existence! All this drivel some womans determination is organic deception. If I take a homeless individual who has no kinfolk into my homestead, kill him, dismember him and conceal the products I even have merely as relatively commited homicide as though I walked as much as somebody interior the mall and shot them ineffective in front of a hundred witnesses! the 2nd a woman is pregnant she is now not handling merely "her very own physique". i don't understand of a single soul who might attempt to stress a woman who does not want slightly one to maintain it and bring up it. We in uncomplicated terms stand corporation that the toddler has each and every precise to stay!! Noone is conscious that the Palins EVER seen abortion! merely because of fact while the surgeon suggested that they had the choice to try this does not advise they ever gave it concept.

2016-11-27 21:55:35 · answer #4 · answered by sanda 4 · 0 0

Is it a private company? It all depends on the agreements that were initially made. Those things need to be worked out in advance before hiring.

2007-03-22 02:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0 0

There is something wrong with this picture, get a attorney and a investigator, prove that they are taking advantage of him and sue them and have them fired.

2007-03-22 03:04:02 · answer #6 · answered by Angelz 5 · 0 1

its ludicrous, this is a typical case of misuse of funding and why needy charities or the like cannot get funding cos theres greedy t***ts who abuse the system.

2007-03-28 10:14:05 · answer #7 · answered by juejua 5 · 0 0

complain to the healthcare commission. www.healthcarecommission.org.uk

it is not on and there are plenty of people who can fight your corner.

2007-03-22 02:29:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers