Has science proved that you can create life from an explosion?

Question

Has science proven that given all the mineral we have, by some chemical reaction you can take any mixture and create a living organism?

I am not discrediting science at all. I know it's great importance, but simply answer the 2 questions?

But, I know that you are going to get defensive allready. See, this is what's important. How you approach any experience. You can never see the truth if you cannot detach yourself from the beneficial truth.

And in fact, even if science was to prove those things, it still wouldn't change me......science, questions about the bible, or other truths in other religions don't shake my faith at all.

My faith in God is based not on you or scientific evidence--it is based on God's simple and understandable truth---Love God, everyone and everything for you have goodness in you.

No, you don't. You only love those who love you, and even those you back stab now and then. For what good is it if a man would gain the whole world but lose hi

Answer 1

Science has not and will not prove that living organisms can be produced out of non-living organisms by means of an explosion or any other event. That fact will not change the mind or heart of someone who does not believe in God. He must believe in something, because he exists, so he chooses ideas like this one.

Answer 2

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are not playing cop, jury, judge, executioner and God knows what else here and will dignify your question with an answer.
To claim that an explosion could cause life would be the same as hearing that there was an explosion at the GM plant last night and a stunning Cadillac emerged from it. Or that an explosion occurred at the Newspaper building and a perfect encyclopedia came out of the debris...
As for loving like Christ wants us to love? Check the meaning of love at 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 and learn what it really is and then you won't come across like a half mad man. Peace to you and hope that you will go on reading and making sure of all things. Who do you think is more powerful, you or your enemy Satan with over 6,000 years' experience in having poor ones like you for his morning snack? Don't tempt him any more than you already have and humble yourself to God and His son, to whom all salvation belongs.

Answer 3

Firstly, the generation of life and evolution has little to do with the Big Bang.

However abiogenesis does have some scientific evidence, thanks to the experiments by Andrew Crosse (replicated by Michael Faraday) in 1839 in which acari (a species of mite) were apparently generated through a mixture of chemicals and electricity. The experiments were repeated many times, under strict conditions, with the same results each time.

Answer 4

Put a frog in a blender and let it rip. Let it sit there for a million years. All the chemical soup scientifically necessary is there to create another frog, or atleast some living thing. Think it will happen? Nah.
Let me ask you, if you hold fast to science and that natural events, and the big bang, evolution and the like got us to this point, the arguement is that beginning matter. Matter can not produce information right? If matter cannot produce information, then where did DNA come from? It HAS to have information. Matter is the source of everything, yet it cannot produce information for DNA, in which DNA is the thing that makes all these chemicals and parts work!

Answer 5

Try this: If scientists with lab-equipment can manage to generate amino acids and even simple protein chains just by using water, methane, carbon dioxide and the like (things present in the early atmosphere, though the relative quantities were a bit off) and zapping them with electricity.... all within the short space of a few weeks in just the one experiment....

.... then do you seriously think that nature, repeating a similar experiment millions of times a second all over the world for a few billion years couldn't manage the same many times over.... enough for those simple proteins to be able to catalyse their own reproduction? Proteins do seem prone to catalysing certain reactions, and for them to do it for their own replication certainly isn't a far stretch.



Wake up to reality, christian.
Your arguments are stuck in the ignorance of the past.
Science has come remarkably close to producing life under conditions far less fortuitous than those of the early earth.

Answer 6

In the film` God` starring George Burns and John Denvir, God says to him,`When the last Herring has been fished from the ocean can man put them back again` this is the sad fact about science and evolution they really do not have any power of themselves.

Answer 7

Science has made no claim to be able to create life from an explosion. However Science is working on creation of life. Eventually they will succeed and probably very soon. They have been very close in many of their tests. I would look forward to seeing success within the next ten years. What will creationists have to say then?

Answer 8

Be thankful that nobody has figured out how to create living entities (aside from the obvious ones were are using to engage in Yahoo Answers)... Humans have this weird and strong tendency to produce an over-abundance of life.

Answer 9

Science has unproven hypotheses that explain how. You need not concern yourself with science because you've decided to ignore reality in favor of your personal "truth".

Answer 10

personally, I am still unresolved on abiogenesis. But that has nothing to do with Big Bang (which I think is the explosion you are referencing). Big Bang is very much a scientific theory, abiogenesis is very much hypothesis. The difference is very important but often misunderstood by, well, christians.

Start of the universe and start of life are different things.

Separating the two (at least for this planet) are some 10 billion years.