2007-03-21 19:33:06 · 8 answers · asked by KrishanRam(Jitendra k) 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In case of danger, one should save nature becoz Man is very destructive towards nature. Humans feel so superior among themselves that they made relegion and then also they try it on nature....
Now, in this modern world, MAN HAS BECOME ENEMY OF MAN then Who takes the guarantee to protect nature by any activity.....
2007-03-21 23:44:20 · answer #1 · answered by PearL 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is from the religious point I will surely save the nature because now a days man has become selfish, he can go to any limit to earn money and ditch the people around. and nature always gives but never ask a single thing back. So we humans are destroying nature if i had a chance i would save the nature not the selfish human beings
2007-03-22 02:39:27 · answer #2 · answered by RUBY 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a question of danger and not a question of religion. If a human being is in danger the foremost duty is to save him. There are humty number of blood donars in India who do not look at the religion before donating their blood.
When India's down south sea shore was uprooted by Sunami, no body looked at the religion of the sufferer before they extended their arms to help them. The devastation that took place by a massive landslide over the Pakistan occcupied Kashmir, did you notice any religious devide?
Any artificial landscape can be remade. The question of saving nature is very deep and probably need further clarification.
When water level of Mettur Water Dam in Tamil Nadu raises up an ancient temple inside the dam area gets immersed. Here you can see humanitarian needs taking the front seat. Nature and Religion both purport facilitating mankind.
2007-03-22 03:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by marsh man 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question is a little confusing, but here goes...
I would save Nature rather than humanity because humanity is intrinsically destructive where as Nature is neutral.
2007-03-22 02:40:40 · answer #4 · answered by Kharm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans are a part of nature, nature is a part of humans.
2007-03-22 02:39:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nature because only that can save human. If we save human what are we without nature. Nature dies human automatically dies can you live without oxygen..? ? ?
2007-03-22 02:41:28 · answer #6 · answered by s_nemish 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Humans, of course! To save their souls!
2007-03-22 02:40:51 · answer #7 · answered by MilkWeed 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say nature because it can't defend itself against us
2007-03-22 02:38:14 · answer #8 · answered by julie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋