Wasn't Al Internet Gore "environmentalist" when environmentalist wasn't cool; unlike Hillary come Eco lately?

Question

Since when has Hillary all of a sudden become "passionately" interested in the alternative energy and environmental issues? Let me guess: Since alternative energy, bio-combustive, global warming, etc., issues have earned mass popularity and campaign-viable status. I guess the poor lady and her inept campaign advisors don't realize that if anyone were to elect anyone solely on the basis of environmental concerns, she would never be elected. Al Gore, for one, has been singing the environmental tune (genuinely or otherwise) for a lot longer time than she has! For the record, I am NOT a republican or a male chauvinist pig that doesn't like to see a woman in the White House; I am just a non-partisan citizen who likes to see a competent, trustworthy, sincere, and affable character in charge of our nation next time! ... Hey, I can always dream of a better world, cannot I?

Answer 1

He was, and got laughed at.

Answer 2

So it IS "eco-friendly" to support "renewables"...hmmm...Tidal Station Power Utilities ACTUALLY exist, their ABILITIES are well known whilst ANY REAL PROBLEM from "greenhouse gases" could have been SIGNIFICANTLY reduced by the wide spread use of Tidal Station Generation Utilities.
This could have been done YEARS ago...if there WAS a "climate" problem.
This could have been done by many of those Nations that rapidly signed the KYOTO TREATY, most even USING Tidal Station Generation Utilities WHEN those signatures where made...

Notice also that Mr Gore has invested in "renewable" energy more directly than is often heard it seems, hence his "early interest". Also the LOBBY effort to garner "grant & subsidy" made early involvement in "renewable energy" more directly profitable also...without any actual need TO PERFORM to expectations. A situation well understood in the Political Arena.

Perhaps the ISSUE of GREATEST interest within the "Environmental Lobby" (noticed by "its" behavior) is to suppress SOLUTIONS to garner some persistence of relevance of RHETORICAL presentations, whilst the ISSUE of SUPPOSED "global warming" IS NOT so REAL after all it seems.
Certainly NOTHING is being done by the "Environmental Lobby" that is other than TALKING, & attempting to make such TALKING the persistent effort.
So the "problem" would be seemingly of far less import than the issue that is made of such...

However predetermined NEED in noticing of the POTENTIAL problem of supplying Electricity to the 2 BILLION people world wide WITHOUT such was IGNORED by the "environmental lobby". This was ONLY to cater (& pander) to expressions of (internal) BELIEF & IDEOLOGY & so also development of CLEAN COAL technology was interrupted, even suppressed...along with Tidal Station Power Technology emplacement & research.
This all as the "greenhouse platform" IS Political in basis & NOT "scientific" & always has been. Hence the number of POLITICIANS involved.

Those 2 BILLION People are no longer waiting however (after ~30 years) for spoilt "eco-bores", one "lost generation" seems to have been enough for those regions involved, poverty is all that has been produced.

NOW Coal IS being used more widely already GLOBALLY & it ALL could have been MUCH cleaner that is it still. The alternative, URANIUM, would be used instead more widely than it is already if the REAL situation was left to the present form of the "Environmental Lobby" to "remediate".
Why? OPINION will not produce Electricity, to those 2 Billion people or any other, nor will "eco-bores" leaping onto, or into, Politicians motor vehicles.


Yours, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)

Answer 3

I like your question and it is about time we have to be serious about Global warming issue and now the dammed is already been done. We can not correct the global Warming problem. We need to look into the alternative energy and environment issue to slow down the Global warming that we destroyed. Al Gore is right and no one takes him seriously. It was a joke when he told the world. Now Senator Hillary has to jump into the Eco wagon to be popular for her 2008 election. She failed National Health Care in the past I am sure she is smarter now. We will have to see what is next. Meanwhile, you and I have to help reduce the global warming problem and urge our Senators and Congress as well as the White House to look into Key to issue. We really need new clean and energy alternative bills as soon as we can.

Answer 4

Global Warming (Gore promotes coal, nukes, oil & incineration)

Gore and Clinton's position on climate change was to make sure that the Kyoto agreement doesn't call for more than a 5% reduction in fossil fuel use despite the fact that all credible scientists say a 70% reduction is necessary to avoid irreversible climate change.

Clinton-Gore administration & Lieberman support nuclear power as a solution to global warming action Alert on Clinton-Gore promotion of Nukes in Kyoto Climate Agreement
Clinton-Gore Do Oil Industry Bidding at Kyoto Talks Gore sells out on Kyoto, promotes nukes, favors oil exploration, does nothing on fuel efficiency standards, fails to promote clean renewables, and supports "clean coal" subsidies (Nader's Open Letter to Environmentalists) Gore's Broken Promises - Raising Fuel Efficiency Standards
Clinton-Gore Administration Promotes Incineration as Renewable Energy
Nuclear power / weapons
Gore Signs Plutonium Pact With Russia (risking transportation and reactor accidents, creating more nuclear waste and increasing nuclear weapons proliferation risks)
Al Gore: Friend of Corporate America (Molten Metal nuclear reprocessing) Uranium Deal Helps Benefactors, But Costs Taxpayers $2.1 Billion Nuke Comeback
See also The Real Al Gore on the military (pro-nuke missiles)

Answer 5

And they are both still UNCOOL!! She is the Third Incarnation of the Anti-Christ and must NOT be allowed any position of such great power, ever!

Answer 6

Gore is a fraud in his environmentalism.

Don’t take my word for it, here’s 17,200+ scientists (and counting) that agree there is no element of truth to Gore's film:
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm...

Answer 7

The question should be. Why do politicians think they have PhD's in environmental science?

Answer 8

What they need to do is employed people that are professionals,and for God sake do things not only talk.

Answer 9

Hey, that sounds like YOU ..... do run run do run...