You're question makes no sense. Not that it is a bad question, it just makes no logical sense. You're asking where was stuff before the Big Bang, which is generally considered the beginning of time. There is no "before time." It's like asking what's higher than the highest point. If you can imagine an uncaused God, you can imagine an uncaused bang.
2007-03-21 15:51:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Planck epoch was the first ever period of time in existence. It lasted slightly more than 10 seconds. It failed to maintain equilibrium the state of singularity switched to cosmic inflation.
How did matter first come into existence? It's yet not completely known. Some people that do believe in a god and the and believe the matter was placed. It could be, but I think there is some other reason for the existence of the universe.
Your question cannot really be answered at this point in time. But just as easily as a god may have come into existence, such matter may have.
2007-03-21 15:59:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by juhsayngul 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
not something can come from some thing. working example: you won't be able to make a bike without supplies around you by any potential and purely an empty dark room. the large Bang and God do consider one yet another. God created the large Bang to set our universe's creation in action. i comprehend the bible says each little thing replaced into created in 7 days whether that could be a controversy of whether or not you view the bible actually or metaphorically. think of of god as a clock maker. He gadgets each little thing in action and then sits back to computer screen it flow. that doesn't propose he does not pay attention or won't answer prayers. he's definitley nevertheless lively in our lives. Pax
2016-10-19 07:40:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good question and one of the reasons why this atheist is not buying into any proposed theory thus far. I can honestly say I just do not know and there is no proof either way, but it does not prove a higher power either it just proves that there are still things yet unknown even by science and perhaps we never will.
2007-03-21 16:00:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by CelticFairy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem to have some major misconceptions about astronomy. Big bang theory doesn't claim that the Earth was formed in the big bang. How could it, if the universe is 13.7 billion years old but the Earth is only 4.5 billion years old? Please look up 'cosmic chemical evolution' and the formation of the universe for more information.
2007-03-21 15:53:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by eri 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
First prove to me that a higher power is needed to create the body of masses.
Then tell me who create the higher power.
then we can start talking about the big bang.
In personal view, why can't it be taken as the universe is the beginning and the ending?
2007-03-21 16:06:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the theory states that it was the result of an explosion from energy but where the energy came from is unknown the matter was created as a result of the explosion the energy reformed into the building blocks of matter ...you really want to know study hard go to college and become a physicist.
plug in origin of the universe in your search engine. or just big bang should render results
2007-03-21 15:54:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Space, time and matter must exist together, u can't have one without the others, so if time were constructed as a result of the Big Bang, then u have to stop and wonder, where did the space come from to fit the matter? When was it put there? See it does not make sense, you can't fit something into nothing. maybe nothingness but not nothing
2007-03-21 15:52:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
One thing bad about science is that all the scientists like to think they are correct and they have a nasty desire to not admit when they are wrong. A scientific theory is rarely admitted to be wrong until there is a more correct theory to replace it and I really hate that about science.
There is a scientific theory that a crude form of life arrived on a meteor and after that time evovled step by step
2007-03-21 15:56:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some theories suggest that there was a pre-existing universe. As it collapsed, quantum gravity changed, and gravity itself became a repulsive force. As the universe got really small, the repulsive force of the universe got so great that it overcame the collapse of that universe (whose space-time geometry was different from our universe, which is why it was collapsing, rather than expanding). Before you know it, the universe is exanding again.
2007-03-21 15:55:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋