Bush said victory in Iraq is not possible: then why do you want to waste life and money in Iraq?

Answer 1

Bush didn't say that.
Little confused, eh, Yank?
Only terrorist supporting Democrats have said that.
Check it out. See why you are confused.
(All Bush said, was that the war on terrorism will go on for years. Disagree??)

Answer 2

I don't recall him saying that. It would be quite the change for him. However, I see the main problem with talking about "victory in Iraq" is that "victory" has never been defined. The world is not the same as it was in WWI or WWII when wars were fought with the amount of land taken being a clear benchmark of who was winning. If it's a "war on terror" that we're still allegedly fighting, then that's something that needs to be fought through intelligence and decisive actions, not large scale military occupation.

Answer 3

that is been shown that a militia victory via US troops everywhere is impossible as long as there's a Dumbocratic social gathering around to flow on and on how we cant win a conflict with all people and decrease off investment to make it take place. (that's what exceeded off with Viet Nam) The Dumbocrat social gathering of on the instant has little to no resemblance to the Democrat social gathering of sixty years in the past. If the well known Dumbocrats were around then, we'd all be speaking German or eastern and there wouldnt be any Jewish human beings around. (for you liberal arts majors obtainable, it fairly is a witty way of asserting we'd have lost international conflict 2) on account which you (alongside with Sean Penn, and the different hollywoodiots who've under no circumstances been there or have been wined and dined via SoDamn Insane) are such an authority on Iraq, how are you able to describe why sixteen provinces out of eighteen are non violent and commencing as much as prosoper? you think of we'd desire to continuously purely run abode and enable them to get pulled into the chaos which might persist with and get 1000's of human beings killed? i presumed you libs have been such international thinkers and have been so in touch approximately anybody everywhere. wager that doesnt incorporate Iraqi voters.

Answer 4

Because while victory is not possible, the seeds of democracy is. While yes we might lose some people to Terrorism (meaning they become terrorists), hopefully we turn more people into democratic people versus terrorists. While I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to see all the soldiers come home, to do so would put all of the people's lives that helped the US in danger, I mean if you were part of a country that hated the army leaving, and you supported them, you would get killed. French that supported the US during World War II when the Germans occupied is a great example. Or how about Germans who were killed for saving innocent Jews, same thing.

Answer 5

you need to get off mom and dads computer before they spank you. bush never said that..the only thing bush said is the conflict will continue and victory is not immediate. you need to stop reading the pelosi press releases.

Answer 6

That is a flat out lie, prove it otherwise.
Thank you for saying that we "wasted" lives. I am sure tha thte families would love to meet you in person so you can explain that to them. You are better example of a wasted life.

Answer 7

Spoken like a true 8th grade girl.

Stick to your i-pod and let the adults talk.

Answer 8

We've already had our victory. Saddam is dead. Maybe you missed it. He fell and broke his neck.

Answer 9

too bad he didn't realize that before he turned that country into an anarchistic breeding ground for terrorists .

Answer 10

Hear Hear!