the bible was written first so it is the reverse of what you are asking, if by your question you are comparing the fairy tale of harry potter to indicate that the bible is a fairy tale then i pray you mature in age and in faith. these sites may help
www.salvationhistory.com
www.fisheaters.com
www.catholiceducation.org
2007-03-21 11:28:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by fenian1916 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you look at christianity and other religions and you compare theories and ideas you will see that they are almost the same with different intentions. Look at the Holy Bible it is the writtten word of God. If you look into the Satanic bible you will see that is the same storyline as the holy bible but is has a different author and the message is basically backwards from the holy bible. Satan was cast down to earth to steal kill and destroy. He uses God's tactics to draw people in to his ways to make him believe that is might be of God or that it is right. There are times that Satan has used God's ways or miracles to use them for his own or to mock the name of Jesus. I guess you could say that the scenes in Harry Potter are not of God and that may be Satans way of drawing you in to thinking that they are of God or else he is making a mockery of Jesus. If you would see the previews for the movie and you had seen that there was nothing of God in it (parting the sea, walking on water) and you knew the difference between God's way and Satan's way would you still watch it? Or would you that it was witchcraft and leave it be and know not to be curious about the previews?
2007-03-21 11:35:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by busyliz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are many accounts in the Bible, which employ a literary device used by Jewish Old and New Testament writers called Midrash. Midrash is the substantive of the Hebrew word darash which means to search, to investigate, to study and, also, to expound on the fruits of the research. The aim of Midrash is to draw from Scripture a lesson for the present.
Midrash could also be defined as a "reflection on Scripture in the light of the actual situation of God's people and of the developments of God's action on its history." It proposes to explain the meaning of Scripture in the light of the later historical experience of God's people. This kind of interpretation often opened the door to embellishments of the sacred accounts, anachronisms, and a freedom in handling and maneuvering the data of tradition that were at times a little too candid and certainly very imaginative.
Peace and every blessing!
2007-03-21 13:07:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It really the author of harry potter could not come up with any ideas for his demonic tale so he stole ideas from the Bible Never read that junk asa CHRISTIAN I DONT READ SEE OR LISTEN TO DEMONIC GARBAGE !!!! Deut 18:10-12 in Jesus day those who practiced such God Dishonoring things were stoned to death by everyone to show their disgust of such dishonorable practices Lev 19:26, 31 20:6,27 also the Bible is 6,000 older than the book mentioned so it came first Gorbalizer
2007-03-21 11:45:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by gorbalizer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never seen an Harry Potter movie but I'm guessing the author had to make it more interesting by copying miracles in the Bible. Just like satan is a copycat of God.
2007-03-21 11:28:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Joanne Rowling writing under the pen name of J.K.Rowling is the writer of the Harry Potter adventures, she must have been inspired by the bible for certain scenes in the book.
2007-03-21 11:33:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they never part any seas or walk on water in the harry potter movies.
2007-03-21 11:29:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Zero 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
a million. Albus Dumbledore 2. Tom Riddle 3. Kingsley Shacklebolt 4. Gellert Grindelwald 5. Mad Eye Moody 6. Severus Snape 7. Minerva McGonnagal 8. Filius Flitwick 9. Harry Potter 10. Remus Lupin. i'm probably going to get many people who disagree with me, by using my putting Harry 9th extremely of one/3 or 2nd. I even meditated putting Lupin formerly Harry, and putting Harry 10th, yet pay attention. Harry isn't a qualified wizard yet. He has in basic terms performed 6th year (this is for the period of DH, different than for the epilogue) and jointly as Harry is courageous and has exceeded maximum wizards his age and issues, he nonetheless isn't a hundred% qualified, and there are a number of magic he hasn't even tried yet, and many magic he hasn't even heard of yet. as an occasion, by using the top of HBP, he tries to duel Snape, yet Snape relatively subdues him. And Harry isn't plenty extra effectual on the top of HBP than he became in DH. and that i'm specific no one disagrees that Dumbledore is the main effectual, and because Albus is merely "a coloration bit extra effectual" than Grindelwald (Dumbledore's precise words) i don't think of you may desire to disagree with my putting Grindelwald fourth.
2016-11-27 20:33:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry Potter is a remake of the bible!
2007-03-21 11:25:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Bible stories are based on faith in God and they really happened.
Witchcraft is from the devil. He is an impersonator of God Almighty. Witchcraft is a counterfeit of true faith.
2007-03-21 11:31:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by runner1 6
·
1⤊
0⤋