Anyone out there care that Bush has killed more Americans then the terrorists have?

Question

So far well over 3,000 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq alone and that doesn't include the ones killed in Afganastan or anywhere else since he started his war against Iraq. Does anyone out there care that he has killed more Americans thenhj any terrorist ever did?

Man you die hard Bush fans are incredible. He attacked Iraq lying about weapons of mass destruction and using stupid people like you to justify his invasion. No weapons were found, not one...he used you all and lied to you but you will call me ignorant and stupid? Incredible, he went and invaded Iraq after September 11,2001 to get Sadam...he had nothing to do with those attacks either and by forcing our troops to go to Iraq Bin Laden has remained free.. Bin Laden's terrorists killed our people not Sadam and Busah sending our troops to Iraq killed 30,000 civilians and over 3,00 American soldiers. Are you people really this blind?

And what in the hell does world war 2 have to do with any of this, trying to confuse the issues just like a tipical Bush supporter would??

Bush caused their deaths, not Sadam or even Bin Laden since Bin Laden had nothing to do with Iraq and by the way Sadam hated Alcada or whatever it is and no they are not defeated that's my entire point. WQe wasted time and resources in Iraq when we should have went after Bin Laden not Sadam.

Answer 1

That's not exactly true. I agree that his poor leadership contributed to their deaths, but the ultimate responsibility in a killing lies with the trigger man. He fed them to the terrorists, but he didn't kill them himself.

Answer 2

Bush did not kill them, he initiated a war for whatever reasons it doenst matter, some people volunteered to go fight for it, and about the same that died in 9-11 have died in iraq and have done so proudly and accomplished a lot. Why do you make it sound like Bush killed them? Also the terrorists are the ones who actually killled our troops.


Edit: also we found WMD's when we went into Kuwait in 91 and we had reason to believe Saddam was now trying to secure them and when the UN said "hey can we see if you have them or not" Saddamm forbid them from coming in, therefore proving that he did in fact have them. He knew what he was doing, if he didnt have anything to hide than the UN inspector would have not been a bother, instead it would have actually helped Sadaam look more credible.




@ Brad B

I just want to say f*ck yah man. Tell this little punk how the real world is and explain to him why hes never seen it nor will he ever understand it with his current mindset.

Answer 3

I not sure Bush killed them. I would say the terrorists killed them. Oh yeah, Im not a die hard Bush fan. I will say this though, Saddam was a terrorist, he basically indicated that he did have WMDs by blocking everything the UN was doing. So, what else did we have to go on? It seems this question is either trying to make Bush look worse than terrorists or trying to justify the terrorists. But look at the bright side, we have crippled Al-Qaeda and many other terror networks when we attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Good job soldiers.

Answer 4

reason using drones in American skies and the skill to kill individuals without due technique basically reason the president assumes them to be terrorists is amazingly unconstitutional. as quickly as people get desensitized to it, the coverage would be pushed farther for use on criminals and different American goals. Plus, under the present rules, all of us might nicely be seen a terrorist. And for the Obama administration to call this coverage 'a ethical way of killing terrorists' ... i think of the founding fathers are rolling over of their graves.

Answer 5

YOU ARE A PIECE OF ****. President Bush has not pulled the trigger, planted the IED, or bombed a single soldier and you for your ignorance to suggest that he has is beyond shameful. The terrorist kill troops. President Bush has sent troops to the Border, to Germany, to Ft. Drum - they aren;t being killed there. He has sent troops to Kuwait and they aren't being killed there. So your argument doesn;t even hold up logically. You mos tlikely have no affiliation with the military and most definitly have not served in this or any war. You are a coward and are scum and honestly do not deserve the freedom you enjoy in this country - and still the soldier has enough grace to fight and protect those who do not deserve it.

Answer 6

I have heard from morons in here but you take the cake. Chalk you down as number one. Your problem is that you are not only a left wing nut and Bush hater, but you are not a student of history either, and come from a fast food and fast fix it upbringing. In 30 freakin day we lost 7,000 Marine and 30,000 Japanese a the battle of Iwo Jima, in the battle of Stalingrad some 2 million Germans and 3 million Russians were lost in a year, in 15 freakin minutes the Chinese and North Koreans lost 17,000 troops on a human wave rush on an artillery out post! Freedom doesn't come cheap jerk face, instead of bitching, why not grab an M-16 and stand a post...other than that a simple thank you would be sufficient! MOVE ON...NEXT!

Answer 7

Another ignorant HEE HAW has proven his stupidity. BUSH has killed NO ONE. Do you people ENJOY looking that stupid? If Bush is responsible then so is every swinging RICHARD in America because we support the men and women in the war by paying our taxes. If we didn't pay our taxes, we wouldn't be able to afford a military.
That makes as much sense as the male bovine excrement coming out of your pea brain!

Answer 8

The 3,000 plus killed on 9/11 did not volunteer to do so. We have a volunteer army. Every death is painful, but to put this in perspective, almost 10 million people died in WWI. You can Google this, it's true.

Answer 9

Some people are so uninformed, or misinformed. Which liberal college or high school teacher is feeding that garbage to you? Go inform and educate yourself son, and get back to us in a few years.

Just saw your silly biased uninformed comment. MANY weapons of mass destruction have been found, go educate yourself and quit buying into the BS that is being fed to you.

Answer 10

The last time I heard insurgents were killing our soldiers, not Bush. I'm for the war and in my opinion I think our troops should stay over there until the job is done. Does that mean I'm killing soldiers?

Answer 11

I do I think they should send home the troops and let them take care of their own problems. they been at it forever. Just let the troops come home and take care of our own