I always wanted a baby boy to be a Jr, but my fiancee is already a Jr, his father was not in the picture when he was a baby, so he really doesn't like his name. I think it's cute to have your first son named after you no matter if he is the 4th fifth or 6th, but how do you feel about naming a baby after a jr to be a third?
2007-03-21 09:54:12 · 5 answers · asked by ♫Mama of One♫ 4 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Other - Pregnancy & Parenting
I dont see a problem with it. My friend (Peter the third) named his son after him (Peter the fourth). They ran an article in the local newspaper about it with a pic of the baby, Pete, his dad, and his grandfather (4 generation of Petes). The headline was Four-pete? "We've all heard of three-peats but this is the first time we've heard of a four-peat!"
2007-03-21 09:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
personally i dont like it. You name your baby after you by giving him the last name. Every JR i have met never tell any body that they are jr's or the III'ds. I think you need to let your child be independent and let him have his own name. But if you are set on it then go for it. Its your child.
2007-03-21 17:04:14 · answer #2 · answered by j 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a great idea. My son is Jr. If his dad would've been Jr. I would've made him III.
2007-03-21 17:00:15 · answer #3 · answered by CHAE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see a problem with it. I have a friend that has a son that is the third, they call him Trey.
2007-03-21 19:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by catfan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there's no problem, in fact, my brother is the 7th lol, and everyone thinks it's awesome =)
2007-03-21 17:04:20 · answer #5 · answered by x0x0sara0x0x 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋