English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is up with all this same sex marriages? Marriage is spoken of as the most holy of unions in most bibles and without these bibles people would simply live with their mates. Furthermore I have yet to study a bible, where marriage originated, that in anyway states sames sex relationships as anything short of an abomination to god so what is the need for couples to get married when the text that they learned of this union says what they are doing is an abomination and that they should not engage in it. Seems like a contridiction in terminology or put simple PLAN ILLOGICAL. How could it be justified would be simplist question??

2007-03-21 09:07:46 · 9 answers · asked by S.O.S. 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

Good news about sex and marriage, by Christopher West

Marriage: Sacrament of Christ and Church. Pgs 20-21

Spouses not only image the love of God with in the Trinity; they also image the love between God and all humanity, made visible in the love of Christ and the Church. By virtue of their Baptisms, the marriage of Christians is a sacrament. That means it’s a living sign that truly communicates and participates in the union of Christ the Church. The marriage vows lived out in the spouses’ “One Flesh” union constitutes this living sign.

Paraphrasing St. Paul: For this reason a man will leave father and mother and cling to his bride, and the two shall become one flesh. This is a profound mystery, and it refers to Christ and the Church . Christ left his Father in heaven. He left the home of his mother on earth - to give up his body for his Bride (Catholic Church) so that we might become “one flesh” with him.

Where do we become “one flesh” with Christ? Most specifically in the Eucharist. The Eucharist is the sacramental consummation of the marriage between Christ and the Church. And when we receive the body of our heavenly Bridegroom into our own, just like a bride we conceive new life in us - God’s very own life. As Christ said, “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (Jn 6:53).

Since the “one flesh” communion of man and wife foreshadowed the Eucharistic communion of Christ and the Church right from the beginning, John Paul II speaks of marriage as the “Primordial Sacrament.” Let’s pause for a moment to let this reality sink in. Of all the ways that God chooses to reveal his life and love in the created world, John Paul II is saying, marriage - enacted and consummated by sexual union - is the most fundamental.

St. Paul wasn’t kidding when he said this is a “profound mystery.” Could God have made our sexuality any more important than this? Any more beautiful? Any more glorious? God gave us sexual desire itself to be the power to love as he loves, so that we could participate in the divine life and fulfill the very meaning of our being and existence.

Sounds great you say, but it’s a far cry from the way sex play itself out in the experience of real human beings. Yes, it is. The historical abuse of women at the hands of men; the tragedy of rape and other heinous sex crimes, even against children; AIDS and a host of other sexually transmitted diseases; unwed mothers; “fatherless” children; abortion; adultery; skyrocketing divorce rates; prostitution; a multibillion-dollar pornography industry; the general cloud of shame and guilt that hangs over sexual matters - all of this paints a very different picture from the one St. Paul and John Paul II give us.

The picture it paints, in fact, is the tragedy of human sinfulness and our fall from God’s intention for our sexuality “in the beginning”.

2007-03-21 09:20:43 · answer #1 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 0 0

If it is not good to kill, steal, commit adultery, bear false witness, etc. If there is any logic there; then you can find logic in the importance of not engaging in acts that may not be in the best interest of society in the long run. God may seem heartless to anyone who loves another person of the same sex. I'd be hurt too, if someone called me an abomination. But what can you do. I'm not going to take a chance.

2007-03-21 09:29:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Bible didnt "invent" marriage. People have been having marriage ceremonies since the beginning of time.
The Bible is not considered the law of this country. It is a work of fiction

2007-03-21 09:23:48 · answer #3 · answered by Together 4 · 1 0

If marriage is supposed to be holy, then why don't you Christians start raging against the validity of atheists and agnostics who marry? Why not attack Muslims who marry? And Jews?

Marriage is marriage whether it is "blessed" or "sanctified" or not. What is so hard for Christians to understand: it's none of your business. None of your business.

2007-03-21 09:15:15 · answer #4 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 1 0

You say that marriage originated in the Bible. Do you have proof of that or are we just supposed to take your word for it??
.

2007-03-21 09:16:51 · answer #5 · answered by Weird Darryl 6 · 1 0

The whole bible is plain illogical

2007-03-21 09:10:58 · answer #6 · answered by rosbif 6 · 1 0

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose taught the Indians to combat against dominance. extremely combat. no longer in effortless terms protest. He wanted freedom and straight away, for India. So he shaped a protection rigidity that he maintained in the jungles of Burma / Myanmar, then, a factor of India. He grow to be no longer pleased with the passive non-violence flow of the leaders. The British had promised to leave India if India helped the British to combat against the Triple Axis in the IInd international conflict. So Indian leaders wanted to co-perform with the British and get freedom peacefully. yet Netaji collaborated with Japan to help him combat the British military. Japan grow to be a factor of the Hitler - Mussolini group, forming the third Axis. Nehru and others have been of opinion that if India did as Netaji pronounced, India might join the dropping area. So the British banned the army SC Bose shaped. Bose believed that Mahatma Gandhi's procedures of non-violence might in no way be sufficient to shelter India's independence, and recommended violent resistance. He everyday a separate political social gathering, the All India forward Bloc and persevered to call for the entire and prompt independence of India from British rule. He grow to be imprisoned by utilising the British government 11 circumstances. Bose recommended finished freedom for India on the earliest, while the Congress Committee wanted it in stages, with the aid of a Dominion status. different youthful leaders inclusive of Jawaharlal Nehru supported Bose and finally on the historic Lahore Congress convention, the Congress had to undertake Poorna Swaraj (finished freedom) as its motto. He grow to be imprisoned and expelled from India. yet defying the ban, he got here decrease back to India and grow to be imprisoned lower back. He fled India and reached Tokyo in might 1943. later shaped the the INA in Burma as mentioed. His death has been a secret. communicate of him and one can't yet link him with Bankim Chandra Chatterjee's Bande Mataram.

2016-10-02 12:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

what does it matter to you?? Does it affect you in any way??

2007-03-21 09:17:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

*Sigh*

Spread that hate, Jethro!

2007-03-21 09:13:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers