If you were against drug testing on animals would you refuse it to save your childs life if the only cure?

Answer 1

Yes I would approve it, in much the same way as I eat animals to live. If its necessary and not done with cruelty or for any sporting or perverted pleasureable feeling, then yes - reluctantly.

Answer 2

Well I'm a vegetarian and against all animal cruelty really, I don't ever think it's morally acceptable to test on animals and we can not justify it on any real ethical grounds.

However... yeah, if it was the only way to save my kid I wouldn't argue with it.

But I wouldn't pretend that made it right. I would just put it down to something awful that I was allowing.

Much the same as stealing from somebody if you needed to feed your babies and had no money. Nobody EVER has a right to steal, but you'd do it anyway, still well aware that you were doing a bad thing.

Sometimes there is no real right and wrong, only two wrongs and you have to pick one to save yourself from the other.

Answer 3

I am not against drug testing on animals, despite the fact that I am a passionate pet lover, with far too many rescue cats, I would choose saving a human child above a cat any day.

Answer 4

Of course I would still accept the drug.

But the point is... alternatives are available (stem cell etc) but our greedy government refuse to invest much money at all into them because they prefer instead to get fat sums from the corporations who use animals. Bush even used a veto to block funding for stem cell research.

I would prefer to see such drugs created through alternative methods - WITHOUT the need for unnecessary suffering.

If you agree with animal testing, please take a look at this page:

http://www.atourhands.com/research.html

Most people who are for it don't really realise the reality of what goes on in these labs. And not only the suffering aspect of it, it is UNRELIABLE - because an animal's genetic structure is different to a humans.

Answer 5

well animals were created below us - they don't have the same "if this drug kills me i havn't lived my life or done things i wanted to " kinda thing goin on - a child does have that option! i dont agree on cosmetics testing on animals - thats totally uncalled for and not needed! However lifesaving drugs - then yes i do believe they should be! the thing is millions if rats are killed everyday as pests so why not use them for something construstive like saving lifes altough i am aware they aren't always the chosen animal for drugs testing!

Answer 6

I fully loathe the thugs who seem to push aside human soreness and suffering of their "reasons". i do no longer believe finding out for splendor makes use of, yet how else can we strengthen existence saving drugs? My mom has been clinically determined with cancer three times, and if it wasn't for the chemo and different drugs she had to take, i doubt she'd be alive as we talk. i do no longer think of the animal terrorists are extremely in it for any specific reason - i think of they in all probability basically ought to justify their motives for inflicting as plenty chaos as achievable. it would not ask your self me in the slightest in the event that they hypercritically take the examined drugs whilst the chips have been down. Dont get me incorrect - i'm no longer biased approximately all animal activists as there are sturdy reasons against animal cruelty from people who extremely do have self assurance of their non violent protests. Its the letter bombing, extreme assaults and what no longer that take place on the labs. i might prefer to understand if there has been a locate out approximately this very subject count - basically how lots of the animal rights terrorists HAVE taken animal examined drugs.

Answer 7

i believe if all the do gooders who go on about drug testing on animals were to be put in the position of their childs life or drugs tested on animals would all back down. The same as all veggies if they were starving and needed food or die would gladly eat meat, sorry if that offends some people but that is the way i see it,

Answer 8

I wouldn't protest if it were my child's life! I know that animal testing is wrong but in some cases it is the only way and who do you love more, your child or an animal that you are never going to meet most likely in your life???

Answer 9

if your child's life hangs in the balance then i would assume any parent would re-examine their personal beliefs. i would.

any parent which could stand back and watch their child die without doing anything do not deserve children and this would be good grounds for any other children to be taken away from those parents for their own good.

hard but emotive.

Answer 10

Yes of course . Just dont approve on testing cosmetics and unnecessary things on animals

Answer 11

yes i would have testing done to save human life