English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he said it would take not weeks , but months , to defeat the insurgents , however , he failed to mention we have already been there for four years now , not just a few months. so , can we still trust Bush ?

2007-03-21 02:35:06 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

28 answers

Goodness no dear. He also said it would take at least 100 years to bring the terrorists to heel.

What is his definition of a terrorist?

Sadly today anyone who says anything against Bush or the current regime is almost a terrorist. I am not American but I have heard chilling things from people and it seems to me that the fascist American regime is terrorist inspired.

The other day a young American mother was afraid to go to a link I sent her because she feared someone might take her from her baby for going to something subversive. I was blown away! Then another told me about having an "impeach bush" sticker on his car. Within a month he was pulled over for nothing five times. He removed the sticker and the harassment stopped.

Honey you all are going to be there for awhile. The long time goal is to weaken and dishearten the American people whilst using up the men as bullets in a war we fight for the Rockefellers and their oil interests in the Middle east.

Bush's role in this is to bring America to its knees via war and the polarization of its inhabitants. Morally and spiritually the work is almost done thanks to feminism, playboyism, and the development of the youth culture. He will drag America into the Third WOrld war by getting you involved with Iran. That is when things will start to heat up even more.

http://xiandos.info/The_2006-_war_on_Iran

Things are not slated to improve for America. There are some grim times ahead for America. 2008 will hold many surprises for America. In fact, I propose that the man who will be the hardest to keep out of the presidential office will be Arnold Swarzenegger. He will make Bush look like a waltz in the park. He is being groomed, just as the Senate is being groomed to accept a non American born President who has always dreamed of being a dictator. This is a man who has, as do the Bush cartel, strong ties to the European Nazi elite. He has received the Bilderberger kiss of kingship.

http://www.arnoldexposed.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/181104pressrelease.htm
http://www.arnoldexposed.com/articles/bush_honors_arnold.htm
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=133&contentid=1749&page=1

Oops! Sorry, back to Bush. LOL. My point is that the men who plan Arnold’s career with him, the Bilderbergs, the Rockefellers, the Rothschild’s, the Vatican, are the same men who have backed and used the Bush cartel from the days of Great Grandpappy Prescott Bush to dear GeorgeW today. The Bush clan has lived out its political usage for the Illuminati and I really don’t see Jeb or Billary or Mrs. Rudy G. in the oval office.

Bush works for the cartel. These are the people who called for war. These are the people who make absolutely billions from the proliferation of arms. War not only helps reduce the population but it keeps them entertained much as chess keeps an ordinary man entertained. He is not the brightest colour on the palette and must be controlled, that is where Dirty Dickie comes in to serve as puppet master. A more self-serving criminal there has never been in the White House. All of the men around Bush are absolute scoundrels with the lowest possible denominator motivating them. Greed and power are their absolute goal.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0206-09.htm
http://www.savethemales.ca/000357.html
Americans are Rothschild Proxies in Iraq
http://www.savethemales.ca/000154.html
Elite Sets the Stage for World War Three

Something very worrisome is happening. Some of Rockefeller's best toadies oppose the Iraq war. But Rockefeller and his ilk are responsible for this war. What gives? It appears the global elite is dividing its minions into two "house teams" again. The last time this happened we had the Fascist-Communist slugfest called World War Two. The same satanic cabal controlled both sides and picked Germany to take the fall.

This time, the U.S., Britain and the "coalition of the willing" are on one side. On the other are France, Germany, Russia and China. The centre of global power is moving to China, Europe and Russia. There will be a world war over Iran and control of Middle East oil. The U.S., overextended from Kuwait to Korea, will come up short. The Iraq war is an excellent way to wear down American resources so that they are weakened when things really begin to move along according to the agenda planned by the N WO elite.

The US will find itself increasingly isolated and vilified as a result of the Iraq war. I suspect the hidden agenda is to bring down the world's last superpower; to replace the UN with a new instrument of "world government"; to kill a lot of people, and to wean Americans off democracy and their high standard of living.

Jimmy Carter, Nelson Mandela, George Soros, Mikail Gorbachev are all globalist elder statesmen-for-hire. Curiously, they all oppose the Iraq war. Jimmy Carter, a creation of Rockefeller's "Trilateral Commission" publicly supported more UN inspections. Mikhail Gorbachev said the war is a big mistake. Nelson Mandela called it a "tragedy" and warned Bush was plunging "the world into a holocaust."

Financial maven George Soros said:" The Bush doctrine is grounded in power; legality and legitimacy are decorations." Finally, Walter Cronkite, who is linked to Rockefeller's CFR warned:

"We are going to be in such a fix when this war is over, or before this war is over. Our grandchildren's grandchildren are going to be paying for this war. I look at our future as, I'm sorry, being very dark."

The leaders of Russia, France, Germany and China also voiced opposition with uncharacteristic bluntness. They must have the OK of the global money masters. "Military action ... is a big mistake," Vladimir Putin said. “Iraq has presented no danger..." China urged the US and Britain to halt their military actions. France, Russia and Germany all refused a U.S. request to close their Iraqi embassies. North Korea apparently is preparing for war.

Before World War Two, a faction of the British and American elite built up Hitler. This was known as the "policy of appeasement." After Hitler fell into the trap of attacking Poland, they did a "sleight of hand" and replaced the accommodating Chamberlain with the defiant Churchill. Iraq is a similar trap. The United States has squandered the sympathy and good will it earned on Sept 11. The images of the World Trade Centre have been replaced in the world's mind by the spectacular explosions in Baghdad.

The US comes across as a bully too cowardly to pick on anyone its own size. Notch this victory up besides its thrashing of Grenada, Panama and Serbia. The gloating by US TV commentators is particularly distasteful to the outside world. It is propaganda at its darkest. The damage to America's moral authority is incalculable. After this war, who will have sympathy for Americans if Chinese atomic bombs rain down on Los Angeles and New York? The devil degrades his victims before he destroys them.

For almost 100 years, the American leadership class has belonged to an international cabal that is determined to dissolve all human loyalties, including the nation state, and establish a global tyranny. George Bush, who is part of this cabal, has led the American people into a trap.

Who in their right mind would deliberately alienate 1.3 billion Muslims? Of course Hussein was a bad man but this was not the motive. The U.S. is acting as gofer for the Zionists and the oil cartels, two leading parts of the cabal. They come out ahead while Americans will foot the bill and take the brunt of Muslim indignation. Can the U.S. even count on Israel? At his trial, Israeli Spy Jonathon Pollard was called "the greatest traitor in the history of the United States” In the words of CIA Director George Tenet, Pollard, an American Jew, stole "every worthwhile intelligence secret we have." In the year prior to his arrest in Nov. 1986, Pollard transmitted "over 360 cubic feet of top secret paper to Israel," his trial was told.

According to Thomas, Israel's Mossad routinely trades information and technology with China's Secret Intelligence Service. Pollard's information could have commanded a pretty price. Thomas says the theft from Los Alamos of the last 50 years of US nuclear research was also a joint Mossad-Chinese operation. He says an Israeli team inspected the American EP-3 spy plane the Chinese forced down in April 2001.

But Israeli espionage must be seen in the context of the treachery of the American political elite in general. During the Clinton Administration, there was massive transfer of critical military technology to China. For example, in late 1994 the Chinese bought and dismantled a McDonnell Douglas plant in Columbus OH that allowed them to produce ultra-modern airplanes and silkworm cruise missiles.

This technology transfer is continuing under the Bush Administration. Consider the recent sale to China of a GM plant in Valparaiso IN, laying off hundreds of workers and moving sophisticated equipment used for making smart bombs. This transfer of nuclear and other technology to China is reminiscent of what took place after World War Two when secrets of the atom bomb were provided to Russia.

Can you see the pattern? Russia and China belong in the cabal and are being used to subjugate the United States. China is to be the new hub because its people are already used to tyranny. In another parallel with the past, American industry is relocating to China and other low-cost countries. At least 3.3 million US white-collar jobs and $136 billion in wages will shift there by 2015. Similarly, Wall Street invested heavily in Nazi Germany in the 1930's. Standard Oil (through subsidiary I.G. Farben owned in part by Prescott Bush), General Motors, Ford, ITT and IBM were mainstays of the Nazi war machine.

In conclusion, while Americans are distracted by jingoism and jiggle, they are being set up for a nasty fall. The leadership class has already "left the building" as it were. Consider Halliburton’s recent announcement of relocation to Dubai as just the continuation of the end game. The end of the Iraq war will find the United States isolated and reviled. As the Bush cabal tries to push its advantage, it will come into conflict with China and other nuclear powers. A major confrontation will ensue and an overextended US will be humbled. Americans will take a greatly reduced place in a new world order.

Americans should direct their anger not at their country but against their political and cultural elite, which is corrupt, cowardly, and traitorous.

2007-03-21 02:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 8 3

You cannot trust him or his puppet Blair, both of these idiots said that the war was over within a couple of days of the illegal invasion. They now say they are there to rebuild the country when in fact all they are after is the oil. I hope that if any one invades this country like the Americans and British did in Iraq we would fight them as the Iraqies are doing, the Americans and British are an occupying army and only quislings and traitors support occupying armies.

2007-03-21 08:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0 0

Trust Bush? This administration has lied to us all, he stated that the war would last a few months, then he said "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" then his staff uncovers a CIA agent, mean while he cuts Education funding (no child left behind), Health care including Veterns, Gives tax breaks to oil companys, gave big tax breaks for the rich, middle income families in the worse shape ever, New Orleans still a disaster, Bush thinks he is above the law and answers to no one except GOD, the one he seems to talk to. Will this March 2007 and his staff said anthor four years in Iran? Can we trust Bush and his staff " HELL NO"

2007-03-21 04:04:01 · answer #3 · answered by LARRY Y 1 · 2 0

That would depend on how one defines "winning". Perhaps in his own distorted view of life "we" are winning. No one wins in war, certainly not the whole of humanity. (There is so much that is wrong--infuriatingly so--about the war in Iraq, from its justifications to how it has been mismanaged.)

As for trusting Bush--I don't trust any politician. The comment is not so much a condemnation of each individual politician, but a condemnation of most, if not all, political processes.


---

"Madness is rare in individuals-but in groups,parties, nations, and ages it is the rule" Friedrich Nietzsche

2007-03-21 07:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by Gin Martini 5 · 0 1

Its almost certainly wrong to blame Dubyah!..He has an IQ the same as his hat size!..He is probably the first 'puppet president' the United States has ever had!..He knows nothing, and says nothing, unless its on the autocue!.Even the questions the American media get to ask him are now 'vetted' by his minders, because he doesnt understand most of them and becomes very confused, i think everbodys seen that!..So, its not a matter of trusting Dubyah, because he doesnt know whats going on in the real world at all!..His controllers wont let him know!..He says what hes told to say, and does what hes told to do!..He doesnt really know any better!...They've even got him convinced hes doing it for God!..Poor man!...

2007-03-21 04:31:41 · answer #5 · answered by paranthropus2001 3 · 2 1

The war in Iraq is a failure, the Brits are pulling out now, ironic that they created Iraq, and now have killed it. Also they were the first to use chemical weapons against Iraqi civilians. Hypocrites

2007-03-21 03:09:30 · answer #6 · answered by danny s 3 · 2 0

No, the administration has a history of distorting the perception of Iraq. "The insurgency is in its last throes" "We'll be greated as liberators" "Mission accomplished". It's a shame that he has to lie like that, but I understand where he's coming from. As commander in chief, he CANNOT say any bad things about the war or express regret with the course it's taken.

2007-03-21 02:38:52 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3 2

Wake up . Radical Islam is in this war to win. They blow up children. They will not stop. They are in this for the long haul. We will be fighting them not for months not for years but for decades. They don't care if they die. Peace will not stop them. What will it take to get you peace at all cost Liberals to see we are in a fight for our very existence. It is a lot bigger than Bush. He didn't start it. Al Quiada started this religious takeover in the 1930's .Their time line shows their victory in 50 years. The world will never be the same. Stop fighting your country and take it to the enemy.

2007-03-21 02:52:43 · answer #8 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 4 1

He's fibbing, big time, you could never trust him, why are you doubting it only now. He went against UN conventions set up to keep the world at peace for 50 years? And for what? Don't say to defend democracy, because thats an even bigger lie and the biggest sick joke that he has tried to force feed the world since (I won't insult you with the comparison I have in mind)

2007-03-21 02:46:21 · answer #9 · answered by Christine 6 · 4 2

The only Bush i trust is my own.

2007-03-21 08:39:12 · answer #10 · answered by Baby 3 · 1 0

Uummm, you mean the same Bush that gave the following speech on the aircraft carrier, USS Abraham Lincoln, on the 1st of May 2003 ,under the banner that proclaimed "Mission Accomplished" ?

See full transcript of the lying toad's words here :

www.cnn.com/2003/US/05/01/bush.transcript/

Count the bodies since that date, oh, sorry the US doesn't do body counts of it's victims, oh well, just do the count of young American bodies then, that should still turn your stomach.

Wake up people ! You're being led to the brink of your own nation's destruction.

2007-03-21 02:56:17 · answer #11 · answered by cosmicvoyager 5 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers