Don't deny it. It is the truth. He approves of defining torture as "equivalent to pain resulting from organ failiure or death." That is way to narrow to be moral. Wake up, my brethren, don't let your hate for the liberal tie you to devils!
2007-03-21 01:43:03 · 18 answers · asked by lonehawk23 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I pray for him just as i prayed for Clinton and every other prez of my lifetime.
come quickly, Lord Jesus
EDIT: it was a choice between someone who would condone the torturing of terrorists or the one who would condone the butchering of unborn babies.
2007-03-21 01:57:06 · answer #1 · answered by sakk_masta 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry I didn't vote for him and think he could very well be a Antichrist or at the least a devil worshiper, he does belong to the cult called skull and bones and that cult is for the rich and very secretive, other presidents have belonged to this cult also but I think the rich gave it a pretty name like a sorority or something like that. I don't know that anyone in America voted for him either time, I think the election was rigged but I've thought that for a long time. And yeah what Muslim-ah said.
2007-03-21 01:53:03 · answer #2 · answered by Angelz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is hard. But also how can a society sit back and let torture and killing going on and keep their eyes shut to the suffering of others. Yes the war is bad and I do not want it...but having traveled the countries involved....the things the people over there have been through is worse than what is going on now. Sadam said he patterned his leadership style after the nazi and that is how he ruled......wrong is wrong
2007-03-21 01:51:04 · answer #3 · answered by chico2149 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thats an easy question. Just look at what the christians do in there spare time.
Luke 19.27
"But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me."
"All sects of heretics are condemned and various punishments are appointed for them and their accomplices."
--Pope Alexander IV
Catholic extermination camps
Surprisingly few know that Nazi extermination camps in World War II were by no means the only ones in Europe at the time. In the years 1942-1943 also in Croatia existed numerous extermination camps, run by Catholic Ustasha under their dictator Ante Paveli笠a practicing Catholic and regular visitor to the then pope. There were even concentration camps exclusively for children! In these camps - the most notorious was Jasenovac, headed by a Franciscan friar - orthodox-Christian Serbians (and a substantial number of Jews) were murdered. Like the Nazis the Catholic Ustasha burned their victims in kilns, alive (the Nazis had victims gassed first). But most of the victims were simply stabbed, slain or shot to death, the number of them being estimated between 300,000 and 600,000, in a rather tiny country. Many of the killers were Franciscan friars. The atrocities were appalling enough to induce bystanders of the Nazi "Sicherheitsdienst der SS", watching, to complain about them to Hitler (who did not listen). The pope knew about these events and did
nothing to prevent them.
Jerusalem conquered 7/15/1099 more than 60,000 victims (Jewish, Muslim, men, women, children).
1648 Chmielnitzki massacres: In Poland about 200,000 Jews were slain.
Massacre of Sand Creek, Colorado 11/29/1864. Colonel John Chivington, a former Methodist minister and still elder in the church ("I long to be wading in gore" had a Cheyenne village of about 600, mostly women and children, gunned down despite the chiefs' waving with a white flag: 400-500 killed.
1860s, "in Hawaii the Reverend Rufus Anderson surveyed the carnage that by then had reduced those islands' native population by 90 percent or more, and he declined to see it as tragedy; the expected total die-off of the Hawaiian population was only natural, this missionary said, somewhat equivalent to 'the amputation of diseased members of the body'."
NEED I GO ON?
2007-03-21 01:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
this is a extremely asinine assertion. fairly because you maximum probable understand that Christians (or the different faith for that count) have faith that ethical codes are in place as a handbook to help us become one with God - sin being something that separates us from God. that's a spiritual question, yet you've gotten non secular human beings mindset the question with their incorrect human minds extremely than their spirit. Your strategies will in no way leave your physique. this is going to rot on your head once you die, and each little thing you concept will rot with it. Your spirit is the sole area of you that has any desire of ever getting into touch with God. God is religious, not actual. you could desire to be extremely empty. You deny the main mandatory area of your self - your soul. Do you even hear your experience of right and incorrect anymore? Or did you kill that too?
2016-11-27 19:27:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I have no love for the Presidency, but if you are talking about the interrogation of terrorists being torture I think you need to realize interrogation is not meant to be comfortable or kind. Realize these are people who may be harboring secrets that could lead to mass murder, and interrogation is necessary and it must be effective. In reality, the only way to deal with terrorists is to execute each and every one of them, because they kill people and they will keep killing people. Let the punishment fit the crime. As it stands now, they are being treated a little too well, considering the things they intend to keep secret and let happen.
2007-03-21 02:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's absolutely right and on the public record that GW has sanctioned torture as a means of extracting info from supposed terrorist suspects in violation of the Geneva convention.
They are also holding people for over five years without trial who been subjected to routine torture.
The weird part is, American citizens are exempt.
The rest of the world is genuinely appalled!
2007-03-21 01:53:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do all Christians support Bush in this ?
Are the only ones supporting Bush proported Christians?
Not just Christians should be in an uproar about this.
2007-03-21 01:52:01 · answer #8 · answered by thankyou "iana" 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait a minute, you have misspoken ... in your main question you said "a President who condones torture". In your details, you say "He approves of DEFINING torture...." which is a bit different than condoning, eh?
That's a pretty good definition of torture, so I'm okay with what he said :)
2007-03-21 02:07:47 · answer #9 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Liberals root comes from liberty and I guess desiring that everyone be treated humanely is a bad thing. I don't understand all the demonizing but anyhow.......I think it horrible and I have never supported this president. If you haven't watched Road to Guantanamo, you should. You'll be even more horrified.
Human rights are sooo important regardless of who you are.
I know this wasn't fielded at me but I needed to respond.
2007-03-21 01:50:38 · answer #10 · answered by Yogini 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most non-Christians confuse torture with justice.
Fighting for what is right and for protection for our country
are principals long since before Bush came along.
Justice must be served. As God is complete justice and rightousness, so his plan is as well.
2007-03-21 01:47:34 · answer #11 · answered by sassinya 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋