Would it affect the people the society the governence of India?
2007-03-21 01:15:12 · 12 answers · asked by shot126 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
INdia would obviously progress and may even become a superpower within the next few years
2007-03-22 01:48:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Look what happened to Iraq. It's a lucrative position to be the head of a country and make whatever laws but the consequences can be really dangerous. In my opinion, dictators don't last long (i.e. Hitler, Mussuloni, Saddam, and at present the head of Korea who is testing Nuclear weapons) and the country do not make any progress in any field. If there was dictator rule in India, then there would have been no progress what so ever. All Indians would have been treated as slaves by the dictator and no one would have any "say" in any issue.
2007-03-21 01:29:40 · answer #2 · answered by Red Man 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are still elements within Indian society who secretly sympathize with the idea of a temporary military-controlled government, imposed as a result of some national emergency. So, don't think it may never happen.
You need to look no further than neighbor Pakistan, and to some extent Thailand, as to how the scenario generally unfolds: one or two key families are hounded and imprisoned over corruption; the dictator promises to step down 'as soon as elections can be arranged'. Life returns to more or less normal, and the military hold on to power indefinitely.
Oh well....
2007-03-21 01:34:59 · answer #3 · answered by Bart S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
India has a long history of military invasion, hence the presence of Muslims, Hindu societies dominating. And for the most part, India has co-existed with absolute rule as long as the population could practice their religion. India is bigger than any military authority.
2007-03-21 01:26:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Go to a used book store. There should be some interesting fiction about dictator/military rule in India. Reader can visit the library or go OnLine sources to learn what history shows on the same subject. If you want a happy ending please visit reading intended for wee children.
2007-03-21 15:56:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think of the Sikhs might take a hardline attitude in distant places coverage which could be a welcome exchange. in assessment to different dharmic faiths you adult men have self assurance in scuffling with for justice, while something persons are extra "concepts your guy or woman company and do the final ingredient" sort of persons different than that i think of it would be exceptionally undesirable. If in effortless terms one religious group ought to rule, it would undermine the secular democracy that all of us cherish. additionally, it would alienate the final public Hindu inhabitants, which might make inner peace puzzling. it would reignite fears in the Muslim inhabitants because of historic tensions. Sikhs ought to take area in the political technique in the limitations of our modern-day establishments. this sort they might deliver constructive impression without undermining our trouble-loose equivalent status.
2016-10-02 12:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is nothing left to happen in india
2007-03-21 23:53:12 · answer #7 · answered by Suraj 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
India would be like hell & we would suffer
2007-03-21 01:42:46 · answer #8 · answered by OMKAR P 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
dictator would have killed you by now if you had asked such question about democracy!
2007-03-21 05:27:49 · answer #9 · answered by Infopath Manager! 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No one could have dared to give real answer to this question.
2007-03-21 01:36:03 · answer #10 · answered by Rahul 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋