Does anybody have any logical equations, websites, or books that explain why a godly presence (or even just the Judeo-Christian one) is impossible?
2007-03-20 16:31:19 · 23 answers · asked by Eleventy 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Here's a few websites that may have the information you're interested in:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/rm.html
http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/imposs.htm
http://www.godisimaginary.com
http://www.whydoesntgodhealamputees.com
2007-03-20 16:35:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You can look at all the explanations in the world as to why it's impossible, but did you ever think that this Godly presence makes look impossible, for those who do not have faith? Like a test? No matter how many equations you may find, the thought will always be there...because you really never know.
2007-03-20 23:37:51 · answer #2 · answered by pinkluxe 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes ..... one logical equation ....
If X = unable to be proven true, then it is false.
Hence
If there is a god and no one can prove it is there, then it is false.
It is impossible to prove something is impossible as impossible is impossible to be proven. It is always the fact to prove possible as possible is possible to be proven. If you cannot prove the possible then it is impossible ...... therefore the burden is to prove godly presence is possible not the other way around.
Get the logic?
2007-03-20 23:38:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God, by definition, cannot be the jealous, petty, vindictive creator god as depicted in the bible, because that so called god is unworthy of the title. This doesn't prove God is impossible, just that the god of the bible doesn't fit the definition of a supreme being. I don't claim to have a full understanding of what a supreme being should be. How could I, with just these two eyes and this puny brain. But I know what it isn't.
2007-03-20 23:39:50 · answer #4 · answered by Oz 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is you that is one the defence, almost nothing is impossible, but to be logical we start out beleiving nothing. Then we seek things and look for proof if we find enough we beleive it.
Where is your proof, we have already shown many bible quotes to be false, contradictive, and ethically wrong.
You can not answer the most basic questions for instance.
All religions say that if I choose the a false religion I go to hell, they all claim to be true religion and tell people to be bias in favor of that for no reason. Thus if there is a god he makes us play a sick game of Russian roulette where the stakes are eternal damnation and the odds 1 in 218 (yes there are that many religions).
2007-03-20 23:39:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I've put alot of thought, and the best part of a philosophy degree, into this one. My own feeling is that rational arguments are inconclusive either way, although I think that Schellenberg's argument from divine hiddenness (and similar arguments from non-belief) are a major problem for many theists. Ironically, this makes atheists an argument for atheism!! Speaking as a theist, I'm not sufficiently worried by it to give up my religion and take up knitting (real faith surpasses rational dissection), but it gives us theists something to think about lest we get complacent!
2007-03-21 00:59:25 · answer #6 · answered by completelysurroundedbyimbeciles 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea of God is quite logical, reasonable, intelligent, healthy, and enjoyable. My main problem with God was I always associate it with church, which is bad news, but as soon as you start thinking about it in terms of an independent concept, like a mathematic proof, then you start to uncover the vast wonders that is God theory.
2007-03-20 23:36:02 · answer #7 · answered by Julian 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is no scientific theory in existance that says that there can not be God. There are a few theories that indicate the need for a creator. Of course nothing has been proven yet.
2007-03-20 23:39:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
God is possible (he is a fact; like it or not). He is superior to man not equal to man; he tells man how 'come up' a level (in Christianity); but (most) man in this country seldom seems to apply that idea presently.
2007-03-21 00:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
(px + ppx) Fpp + p Fpy + Fpx – Fy = 0
Where p is God, x is the Universe, F is the speed of light, and y is Jim Baker.
Mathmatical proof that God does not exist.
2007-03-20 23:38:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋