Since there is no such thing as evolution,I'm guessing....NOWHERE !!
Look....With all the trillions of animals that have died on earth in the last ten thousand years or so....NOT ONE transitional form,living or dead...ANYwhere.The odds are 4.7 trillion to one that evolution is a fantasy.I like those odds.
2007-03-20 15:43:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Some paleontologists (notably Jack Horner) have recently begun to question whether T. rex could have been an effective hunter, given its small eyes, puny arms, and relatively slow gait (Note: many other paleontologists think that T. rex had good eyesight and was a relatively fast dinosaur.) Horner's alternative theory is that T. rex scavenged its food from other animals' kills.
Scavengers need a good sense of smell (to find meat) and means of long-distance locomotion (to get to the meat). There is evidence that T.rex had an acute sense of smell (deduced from room in its skull for large olfactory lobes in its brain). Also, T. rex's large legs would provide ample means of long-distance locomotion.
There are arguments against this scavenger hypothesis. Recently, Dr. Kenneth Carpenter (from the Denver Museum of Natural History) found a healed T. rex tooth mark on the tail of a hadrosaur (a duck-billed dinosaur). This is evidence that T. rex was an active predator, and not simply a scavenger. Why else would T. rex bite a duck-billed dinosaur?
Other arguments against the scavenger hypothesis are that small eyes do not necessarily imply poor vision. Birds (dinosaurs' descendants) have relatively small eyes but acute vision. As for T. rex's puny arms, arms are not necessary for predation; many predators have no arms at all, like sharks and snakes. As for T. rex's gait (speed), there were many animals that were slower than T. rex; these would become its prey, not the speedier types.
2007-03-20 22:44:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Raiden 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
that is the funniest thing that i have seen on here all night! T Rex was not possibly a vegetarian, he simply did not possess the equipment to be one.
all his teeth were designed to puncture and tear meat like our own K9 teeth. he couldn't of ground down plant matter if he tried.
there is scientific evidence to support that T Rex was not a predator but a scavenger, but there is none what so ever that would support the claim that he was a veggie!
i just want to add that all you lot that agreed with this should really try watching the discovery channel! especially you, church of yahoo. at the risk of sounding rude. I HAVE NEVER HEARD SO MUCH CRAP IN ALL MY LIFE.
2007-03-20 22:44:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yes. I did know that. It occurs quite often in evolution. Two species of "bizarre" bird-like dinosaurs that lived 90 million years ago have been unearthed in New Mexico.
A vegetarian sloth-like dinosaur with a beaked head, called Nothronychus. It is a therapod, as is its cousin, Tyrannosaurus rex.
Nothronychus, which would have walked mostly upright, weighed about one ton and stood three to 3.5 metres tall, say the team. It probably used its long arms to pull down branches to reach leaves
2007-03-20 22:40:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
No it's not true. You bought into another Creationist lie. The roots of wolf teeth are only a fraction of the size and they will take down moose. The chlorophyll could get there any number of ways, pre- or post-mortem.
2007-03-20 22:54:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The T-Rex wasn't a vegetarian...
It was a carnivorous beast what ate everything!
What do you think all those razor-sharp teeth are for? Getting corn stuck in them? I don't think so. They were for ripping and tearing the meat of other dinosaurs.
Whoever told you that the T-Rex was an herbavore is a filthy liar.
and by the way, your bullcrap link doesn't work
2007-03-20 22:39:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kay the Great 2
·
8⤊
2⤋
T-Rex was more on terms of beasts that may have been altered by either demons or by the rebellious acts of humanity. Note, no animal attacked one another till Adam and Eve sinned. So, the thinking must have been that God wouldn't knowingly create something to do nothing more than aggressively attack other creatures. See in Revelations, where the Lion will eat straw and lay beside the Lamb... So don't let teeth alone fool you.
2007-03-20 22:48:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I happen to agree with you about evolution. But the errors in evolution doesn't prove the bible as total fact. I am sorry to say the bible and evolution are mutually exclusive.
2007-03-20 22:54:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by T-Rex 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The requested URL http://chrisandcreation.com/evolution.ht... was not found on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Where does this occur in creation?
2007-03-20 22:40:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by netthiefx 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Go grind up some leaves with big sharp needles. Do this in an efficient manner, and get back to us. Test these things.
2007-03-20 22:53:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh, yeah, T-Rex that one wrestler, on WWF, didn't know he was a veggie though. Thanx
2007-03-20 22:54:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋