I mean if you talking with the pro amnmstey crowd they will think one way when you talk with them. While the pro anti amnesty crowd will state how unfair theses American prgrams are and with pro amnesty crowd they convey not enough is being done to address this issue ? What thoughts will you have on this subject . Plz n o racist comments. Thank you......zoe. Should the focus of the pro AMNSTEY be demanding America cut off these progtams. ? what do you good folks think ogf the pro's and con of rhis
2007-03-20 15:18:45 · 12 answers · asked by Zoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I agree with Lakota here. Also, if it is true that gang members and drug smugglers/dealers and other criminals who are illegally here are being hunted down and deported as fast as possible, I am all for that, but I also feel that all the rest of the illegal immigrants need to be deported as they are located, too. If, as someone also said, 95% of them are "good" people, then they should show their goodness by going home and returning via the legal procedures. That is how we will judge them to be "good" people.
2007-03-20 18:46:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There have always been double standards in pro-amnesty arguments on the immigration issue. I am not just finding this out. Anyone who thinks that calling everyone racist, while stereotyping white people is not a double standard, doesn't know the definition of "double standard".
Pro-Anti-Amnesty? Leave off the "pro". It's anti-amnesty, anti-illegal alien, or anti-illegal immigration. As far as what little sense I can make from the rest of your question (it's written very incoherently), pro-amnesty people shouldn't be demanding anything. The government should not address the demands of illegal invaders, just like the government doesn't address or meet the demands of terrorists.
2007-03-20 16:22:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
the subject with illegals is that one they're unlawful. 2 they do no longer pay taxes, and yet they'd get drivers licenses, and scientific scientific care some circumstances even food stamps and coverage. i think maximum are innocuous, no longer hassle-free workers who only prefer a marvelous existence, yet they'd desire to be legalized and pay taxes even back taxes and in the event that they wont legalize they'd desire to be deported. If i became in congress i might pay attention to the final public for one concern yet i may be for deportation on account that is against the regulation. attempt sneaking into china or someplace like that and notice what happens to you.
2016-10-01 06:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by kelchner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot apply American Law/Laws to people that are not American Citizens or have not been admitted to this country by this Countries Laws.
Do our Laws apply to Germans or Swedes?
Only if they are in this country legally! Otherwise they are German and Swedish citizens.
No country has to make laws according to what citizens of other country want!
America has immigration Laws! They do not need to be changed, in fact, their is NO reason to change them!
If America says, 1 million cannot immigrate, that is America’s choice. No country has to let anyone immigrate into their country!
Only American citizens have American rights!
Non American citizens cannot DEMMAND anything from America, unless the are here according to American Law!
Anyone illegally in this country has broken American law, they are criminals, but they are not entitled to American Criminal system!
They are entitled to be put out or jailed without mercy! They are entitled to the same rights that they would have if the sneaked into Turkey, Russia, China, or Egypt.
Not one of those dummies yelling Amnesty has ever served in the US Military, neither have they lost a love one on the battle field.
Our soldiers. buried all over the world, did not die so some loser could break our laws and sneak into America, use forged documents to gain access to American rights and privileges.
The next person that tells about amnesty, ask them which military unit did they serve with.
When they say none, ask them why not?
It is easy to give America away when you do nothing to support or serve her.
2007-03-20 15:44:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
They have to go, regardless of anyone's subjective assessment that "95% of them are good." If they're good, they will go through the process of becoming legal. Subverting the law by sneaking over the border, flying under the radar on taxes while taking full advantage of schools, hospitals, public housing, etc does not make them good.... it makes them thieves.
A reminder to the people who think all this is just fine.... It is illegal, against the law. You really can't ignore that fact and call yourself a rational person. What you think about people from other countries is completely irrelevant. This is not a college fraternity, popularity contest, or your personal dream world. America has never been about anarchy, we have laws and social order. We have enacted those laws through the will of our people over a 200+ year history. Don't like it? Peace out.
2007-03-20 15:48:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
I second what Mex American said. I read in Time Magazine that DHS was hunting down and getting rid off all illegal aliens that had committed a crime of any type. Drug dealers, child molesters, murderers, etc.
2007-03-20 15:49:18 · answer #6 · answered by Mother of 5/Madre de 5 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I do not understand what you typed, it's garbled. But I will say this about the ICE deportations and that is that they have one good thing: Getting rid of the gang members. The good people ie about 95% of all "illegal aliens" are not being deported because the ones that ice is deporting are the ones with criminal records. By all means, get rid of the gang members, but LEAVE THE GOOD PEOPLE ALONE!
2007-03-20 15:33:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Pro anti???I'm confused.
2007-03-20 15:46:05 · answer #8 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I don't find that at all. Most are committed to their beliefs.. How many conversations do you have with the pro side? I am pro amnesty and have no double standards on this issue. Maybe those conversations you are having are between this ID and your other one.
2007-03-20 15:30:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
Not me. Zoe, if you don't mind my saying so, I think a 19 year old should be out enjoying life instead of obsessing over illegal immigration and taking peoples responses so personally.
2007-03-20 15:26:21 · answer #10 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 4⤊ 7⤋