English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Beside doing a search and getting a lot of info about other people. Seems as if they were not recognize or anything to this day. Just curious, because most of us would be going to schoool or working with some of them, or maybe having a relationship to one of them. Weird huh.

2007-03-20 10:15:26 · 4 answers · asked by goldlv89103 1 in Arts & Humanities Genealogy

4 answers

I'm getting confused. Since when don't genealogists count stepchildren and adopted children as descndants of a person? I've never met a genealogist who didn't. So where is this new double standard coming from?

2007-03-20 14:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by The Academy Is 2 · 0 0

They are not recognized, for the simple reason that none existed. Can't have descendents from a non person.
George did have stepchildren, via his wife. Technically, those are not his descendents. You could be confusing descendents with relatives, which he certainly had. But descendents come from birth children.

2007-03-20 18:33:29 · answer #2 · answered by wendy c 7 · 0 0

George Washington has no direct descendents.

2007-03-20 17:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by hgherron2 4 · 0 0

George Washington had no children. He and his wife, Martha, raised her daughters from her previous marriage.

2007-03-20 17:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers