English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-20 09:32:43 · 4 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 in Environment

4 answers

Actually no, the actual estimates for the range are from 70 years up to some 500...

It all depends which price you are ready to pay to extract the mineral... some fields have a much lower U-235 content and can be expoited, but at much higher costs

Canadian technology has the advantage to run on non refined uranium which avoids this complicated step of separating uranium isotopes.

Till now, no fast breeder has been very satisfactory in the long run and they have the disadvantage to creat locally nuclear fuel which can be used for military purposes especially plutonium.

2007-03-20 09:47:15 · answer #1 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 0 0

A lot of years since in the present nuclear reactors only a few percent is used. The so-called spent fuel can be utilised
in fast breeders reactors. there is enough for many hundred years.

2007-03-20 16:38:21 · answer #2 · answered by giorgio s 4 · 0 0

Your question assumes that all energy is 'created equal'. Nuclear Power is sufficient for generating electricity, but does little for transportation. How do you run cars, boats, truck, trains, planes, tractors, etc?

As far as electrical power goes, Nuclear Power would be sufficient for 100's of years.

2007-03-20 16:44:11 · answer #3 · answered by Bayou Brigadier 3 · 0 0

longer than mankind will be here

2007-03-20 16:36:37 · answer #4 · answered by BajaRick 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers