2007-03-20 08:53:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
When Adam and Eve lived in the Garden, they lived only to serve the Lord, subservient, subordinate. When they ate of the fruit, it was an act of rebellion, and we have had free will ever since, they didn't have it before, so I would say yes.
2007-03-20 09:02:44 · answer #1 · answered by beatlefan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the view of physical science, every observable phenomenon can be explained on the bases of the known laws of nature or laws yet to be discovered. If there is a phenomenon that we cannot understand or explain with our present state of knowledge, then we have to await future discoveries and developments. The fact that we do not understand an event or a phenomenon should drive us to seek an understanding of it. There are no mysteries in science; everything has a scientific explanation.
2007-03-20 15:56:30 · answer #2 · answered by Irreverend 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, if you read Genesis 1-3, you will see that we already had a voice. You will also discover that there is no mention of the man and woman ever seeing God after they ate the fruit which was supposed to give them the ability to see "Good and Evil." And the choice to eat the fruit removed any future choice.
2007-03-20 16:00:59 · answer #3 · answered by shenriver 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It also gave us a choice.
Sorry I had to say that because not only true but it rhymes.
2007-03-20 15:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God tole them the rules and they knew not to touch it already but Satan came with his wickedness..
2007-03-20 15:57:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because trees can't talk.
2007-03-20 15:57:17 · answer #6 · answered by Tenn Gal 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no,
it gave us KNOWLEDGE.
God gave us free will, VIA voice
2007-03-20 15:56:36 · answer #7 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no anton it gave us death is it hot down there or what lol
2007-03-20 15:57:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it gave us knowledge...otherwise it would have been called 'the tree of voice'. Duh!
2007-03-20 15:59:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋