if you believe that the bush administration lied to go to war with iraq then why did they not falsify evidence to prove it. I mean one person one photoshop for six hours and one typing for four hours woulda done it. i'm not saying that they didn't lie but if why not cover it up
2007-03-20 07:55:29 · 3 answers · asked by Ash 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
saddumb was in violation of all kinds of un sanctions and agreements
according to the First gulf war
and he is the first mooslemm dictator to realize yoiu mess with the US this is what you get
so too bad , based on the sanctions alone he is gone
now we need to relax the ROE and clean house
2007-03-20 08:35:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
There are enough people who can identify a fake, if they were caught, it ould have been grounds for impeachment or a criminal investigation of the person who committed the crime since GW would not have taken the fall.
2007-03-20 08:04:12 · answer #2 · answered by greid13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter whether there was false evidence, no evidence, or valid evidence.
Once Congress authorized the use of military force in Iraq, the US invasion and deployment was legal. It wasn't a "war" in the legal sense, because Congress didn't declare war. But it was a legal occupation under US laws.
2007-03-20 07:59:04 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋