English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I dont want any technical stuff or statistics, just a plain opinion or a simple fact on the Alps ONLY!!

Thank You!!

2007-03-20 07:23:51 · 3 answers · asked by i'm gay 2 in Environment

3 answers

OPINION OF A BANKER IN SWITZERLAND

We don´t lend money to ski resorts located at 1400m or below... with a decreasing number of snowed days, their future return on investment won´t allow them to pay us back the money.

100 days of snow are required and it looks like we´re heading to 28 which is by far unsufficient for the resorts located in lower plains.

2007-03-20 09:32:27 · answer #1 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 0 0

that's unbelievable that human interest does not have some result even though it keeps to be to be shown how plenty and the quantity to which that's discernible from history version. some scientists say that's considerable although i'm not powerfuble to choose. climate and the climate that impact that's merely too complicated for us to have an entire information of all the climate in touch and their inter-relationships. Our fashions are, at ideal, an approximation. using modelling isn't new and we use it frequently to administration our financial gadget, plan nutrition production and so on. the kind is that a small blunders in those has a rapid comments time and can be corrected formerly the end result will become too great. A small blunders in a climate kind can effect in over careful predictions or, far extra dangerously, over confident predictions yet with out the fast comments cases to allow corrective action formerly a disaster. That on my own is a reliable adequate reason at the back of warning although not panic. some human beings advise the opinion of scientists is pushed by using very own economics extremely than data. What concerns me is various a similar human beings then bypass directly to declare they reject the belief of climate replace because of fact the financial result on them (jobs, potential costs, financial boost) could be too great. isn't that the form of economic argument they're applying against the scientists to discredit them? we are all pushed by using economics to a pair quantity. If climate replace predictions are even partly precise, then we would be pushed by using them much extra. besides the fact that if that's okay to devour and pollute, then why don't you deliver the full worldwide as much as the intake and pollutants point in step with individual as .... say .... the u . s . a .. that could be ok does not it? I advise, if this is advantageous for usa, it might desire to be ok for China and India and Africa and Europe and Oceania ... precise? or perhaps, that could be especially damned stupid because of fact all of us understand that there is a clever threat that human interest has some result on the ambience. no one right here is in possession of the completed data. What we've are partial truths and shielding self-interest. worry makes issues unwelcome, not incorrect. forward making plans makes them doable then, if it does not happen, we've been given off gently and can locate our financial conservatism interior the fast term interprets to financial rewards interior the long term.

2016-11-27 00:59:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It can do nothing but get better.

2007-03-20 07:29:17 · answer #3 · answered by bignose68 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers