You CAN prove the "non-existant" by providing UNDISPUTIBLE facts of how you became. Which you cannot and will not ever be able to do.
Science thinks they know, but God gave scientist their minds and is farrrrrrrrr more intelligent than even the MOST intelligent of people.
2007-03-20 07:23:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Correction: scientists... not science.
2007-03-20 07:24:34 · update #1
********.
2007-03-20 07:24:58 · update #2
did you notice how NONE of them ANSWERED my question? they all said, "you can't prove a negative..." (uh...okay....) and "sorry sweetie, the burden of proof is on YOU...." i knew it, i knew it, i KNEW it.... turn their questions around on them and they got nothin'
2007-03-20 07:30:47 · answer #1 · answered by Vol_Fan 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
there is not any data of God. that's area of it. IF there substitute into data, then all and sundry (nicely, not all and sundry. Heck, there are nevertheless people who say the Holocaust did not ensue!) might have faith. hence it truly is spoke of as faith. there is a superb sort of historic data of issues that have got here approximately, of human beings and places who've existed, etc.. yet data of God? No. not the data which you may have faith. Thomas Aquinas Suma Theologica has an excellent sort of proofs of God, yet you will not have faith them. Or a minimum of, it truly is how I interpret your view based on your statements and the kind you write them. Oh and Jason's answer? It wasn't certainly one of your fallacies. So don't get on his case. No the place do you have a fallacy of, in simple terms because of the fact it exists does not recommend somebody made it (or some thing comparable). So subsequently his answer is okay, in accordance to you.
2016-12-19 09:50:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can prove it.
I sent an e-mail to God@Heaven.com
even SMS'ed, WiFi'ed
bluetoothed,
blackberried,
GPRS'ed
3G'ed,
finally even smoke signalled dammit...
no reply....so conclusion is either there is no God, or I need more from that 3 litre Vodka bottle
2007-03-20 07:30:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok.
Can you prove there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster? You CAN prove the "non-existant" by providing UNDISPUTIBLE facts of how you became. Which you cannot and will not ever be able to do.
So I guess that means the FSM is true. Thanks, I needed that boost to my faith in his noodley-ness.
2007-03-20 07:27:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Woah, you're real intelligent, good thing your non-existent god gave you a non-existent brain.
God did nothing and will continue to do nothing.
2007-03-20 07:57:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
>> God gave scientist their minds
>> [God] is farrrrrrrrr more intelligent than even the MOST intelligent of people.
Can you provide evidence for either of these claims?
2007-03-20 07:28:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
so....what?
do i need to prove that unicorns DO NOT exist? nope.
the same applies to your god.
as carl sagan once said; "extreme claims call for extreme evidence"
you have made the claim (that god exists) so its up to you to prove it or keep your mouth shut.
2007-03-20 07:26:53 · answer #7 · answered by johnny.zondo 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Can you prove that there is no Blowfiend Lapelgogger?
2007-03-20 07:26:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am God.
Does that prove it?
2007-03-20 07:27:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
How many times must this question appear. Be more unique, will you.
2007-03-20 07:28:04 · answer #10 · answered by Wabbit 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You guys are in cahoots, no? Tryin' to make Theists look bad?
2007-03-20 07:27:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋