If I tell you that I have definitive proof of gods existence but yet he does not exist, isnt it just as confusing as saying that you have absolutely no proof but yet he still does exist?
2007-03-20 05:30:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well how about this is is God is "everything" God must be both everything AND nothing, therefore both statements are true.
Nothing both does and doesn't exist.
2007-03-20 05:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If God does NOT exist, the person claiming "absolute proof" is mistaken. If God DOES exist, the person claiming "absolutely no proof" can still be correct. Being supernatural, God could exist without empirical proof, but "proof" cannot exist without God actually existing.
2007-03-20 12:41:42 · answer #2 · answered by skepsis 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no. 100 years ago there was absolutely no proof that quarks existed, but they did anyways.
2007-03-20 12:36:27 · answer #3 · answered by a 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No..God reveals his truth to who he choses and is not revealed by anyone but himself.God has chosen to reveal the truth to those who love the truth and to those who seek the truth and to those he has given a gift and this gift is faith anf through faith comes revelation and a real relationship with him.
2007-03-20 12:39:43 · answer #4 · answered by djmantx 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes is the simple answer!
2007-03-20 12:36:09 · answer #5 · answered by larrythesheep 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ta-da!
2007-03-20 12:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
...my head hurts...
2007-03-20 12:33:44 · answer #7 · answered by Stormy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋