our "leader", with the lowest IQ of any US pres in history, whom i firmly believe should have never been reelected along with his crappy administration, has led us into this one sided attack leaving innocent people dead. the real reason for this devastation?? YOU tell me... bc as far as i'm concerned ~ there is none. weapons of mass destruction? through the iraq survey group, we have concluded that there are NO weaps. of mass destruction.. so why are we still harming civilians and why aren't our troops home!
2007-03-20 04:23:48 · 19 answers · asked by Mg 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I offered to buy Dave S a plan ticket out of this country....can I put you on that same plane??
2007-03-20 04:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by twinmomm 3 · 11⤊ 1⤋
Your ignorance is glaringly apparent in this inane "question." You obviously have done ZERO research into actual facts but choose instead to accept without question the lies, distortions and half-truths spouted by the Demoncrats who have nothing better to do than trash our President.
Your belief that he never should have been re-elected means squat. He was re-elected, and that's that.
News Flash, skippy - the only ones killing "innocent people" are the terrorists and insurgents. Or are you going to find a way to blame their actions on Bush, too?
Another News Flash, skippy - there WERE weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq. See, genius, it's like this: the term MWD applies to nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, not just nukes like you and the rest of the Demoncratic sheeple like to believe. When our troops went into Iraq they found more than 600 TONS of chemical munitions ready to go. Of course, you didn't read about this in the papers or hear about it on CNN...wonder why that is?
Our troops aren't home because they're not done yet. And if you and the rest of your Demoncrats - including that pack of dogs in Congress - would stop bad-mouthing our troops and actually do something to HELP them, they'd be able to finish and come home!
You ain't a part of the solution, skippy....you're part of the problem.
Get on the plane with Dave.
2007-03-20 07:14:47 · answer #2 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not the brightest guy, I'll give you that. But the way you trash him, you seem to have had a better plan for 9/11 and Katrina if they were to land in your lap. By all means, please enlighten us with your wisdom??????
God forbid the guy actually listens to the head of OUR (not just his) intelligence dept.
And sure, no WMD. But see if the Kurds, along with everyone else that Saddam was killing by the hundreds, mind that he's not in power anymore.
If you think all problems will be solved by simply packin up and running home, you are truely one of the dumbest people on the planet. Even worse, you probably wont be alone. So sad.
What I dont get is why that concept (and an easy one at that) is so hard to grasp??? Not saying it's gonna be a picnic, but it has to be done. Don't like it, don't join the armed forces.
2007-03-20 04:45:58 · answer #3 · answered by snwbrdr960 3 · 7⤊ 2⤋
i think of it rather is a question for the ettiquitte area. i've got faith it may be suited to handle him as President and not Mr. yet in keeping with risk in the event that they have already met him , they're entitled to call him Mr. i think of utilising a call is seen formal / respectful. I donot be attentive to how lengthy it rather is envisioned or if he might ask to be observed as Mr. or George after he's been presented. i be attentive to that he, the President is well-known with a number of the clicking with the help of first names and calls them with the help of first names in the q and a area to the status/state of union speeches.
2016-10-19 04:08:05 · answer #4 · answered by seabrooks 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Miss ignorance lets see, shall we?;
o-Who was President when 407,000 +
Americans were Killed in 4 years?
o-Which President abandoned American Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen & Marines to years of Torture & death from their Captors?
o-Who was President when 232,000 Americans were Killed in 2 years?
o-Who was President when 33,000 Americans were killed in 3 years?
o-Who was President when 40,000 Americans were killed in 5 years?
o-Which President sent 120,000 Americans into Detention Camps based soley upon their Race?
o-Which President used the Sedition act to send anti-government protestors to Federal Prison for 10 years?
o-Which President let the "Malaise"index climb to it's highest levels since inception?
o-How is it that the current President had Higher GPA than John Kerry?
o-Which President ACTUALLY enforced Censorship?
Let me know when you get the answers Dilettante, M'Kay?
2007-03-20 06:23:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As to whether or not he is the worst president, that remains to be seen. Currently, with tension running high, it doesn't leave for a biased and non-emotional based view of his credentials. Also, many people have felt that previous presidents were the worst, and most people always feel that the current times are indeed the worst times. Only history can judge, and likely after we're all dead, which will be the only time when people can take a rational view of Bush's presidency as a whole.
2007-03-20 04:32:09 · answer #6 · answered by Wee Bit Naughty 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
President Bush is probably one of the best presidents we have had. I am not saying he is the best, but one of them. The only reason we made the decision to go into Iraq is because our president got false intelligence from an unreliable source, but it was the only source we had at the time. It was either believe the source and attack, or take the chance whether to leave saddam with or without WOMD. it was a chance we could not take, and Bush made the right decision. And we are not harming civilians, we are aiding them and their military until they are at full strength again, and able to sustain themselves. our mission right now is to establish a unified iraq within democracy, where their people will get the freedom they deserve. As an American I am dissapointed at you, you call yourself an American, and only want to leave a country where the people need us, I am ashamed of you, and every other protestor. we are the United States the most powerful nation on earth in all branches, except for the people. you and others like you have demonstrated the only weakness our country has, and it is yall. we conservatives know whats right and we will always fight for success, against you democrats who desire failure.
2007-03-20 05:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
NO, the worst president ever was Jimmy Carter. Look up the facts and research the history.
2007-03-20 06:01:36 · answer #8 · answered by vegaschic 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
a agree,....... He had planned to invade iraq long beofre sept 11.... and to one of me above the un had inspected iraq many times and had came up with no wmd. oncew they were denied and the war started the un was allowed in and cleared them again.
the truth of the matter is the the Bushes have money invested in iraq and if we dont fight for it then bush could loose all of his money.
I think he is the worst president we have ever had....he father was a better president, clinton was a better president and regan was the best along with kennedy.
the was between the sunnis and kurds is a religion thing and under the geneva convention we are not suppose to get involved in a religion war.
also when we got saddam and found there were no wmd we should have left...
what good is coming from us being over there? we built a school after we were finsih 2 days later those people blew it up... what a waste of money and time. we need to send all of our people home....
2007-03-20 06:02:53 · answer #9 · answered by dazed n confused 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
As much as I feel we shouldn't have start with Iraq but rather gone after Bin Laden in Afghanistan where he really was when we invaded, we have to finish what we started. Or else it will be a worse mess. The problem is that there is no exit plan, no desire to allow Iraq to become a truly independent nation.
2007-03-20 04:30:58 · answer #10 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
The answer remains to be seen, however, he IS our President, and regardless of my personal views, I am proud to live in a country where we protect our right to have and state an opinion such as yours. Imagine you posting this "Q" in Iraq. The USA - love it, or leave it!
2007-03-20 04:43:22 · answer #11 · answered by Pretending To Work 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋