2007-03-20 03:15:36 · 22 answers · asked by Brendan G 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't understand why simply asking if Jesus was human is offensive.
2007-03-20 03:20:47 · update #1
Rhona W: why would you find this question offesnive? This is not just the case for Jesus, but for all humans you tool!
2007-03-20 03:19:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
all humans came from evolution. all humans have 98% of a monkeys d.n.a rather they choose to accept it or not. scientist don't make this up guys for nothing. i don't care how mad this makes you, i am entitled to my knowings just as you are. you people need to start thinking for yourself and not some old dusty million year old book. worshipping a white man on a cross, pathetic!
2007-03-20 10:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This comment is for Not of this world,
I try my best to love Christ, I still have my own struggles, so this is not coming from an atheist. But, your comment did not make sense my friend.
So what they didn't have DNA testing back then, how does change his physical makeup?
2007-03-20 10:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by Mello Yello 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He was hybrid: 50% God molecules---
Where we are only say about 5% soul,
Jesus was a full 50!% That's a lot in heaven...almost pure.
unfortunately, he had to come out of a woman's reproductive organs,
that soiled him.....made him part evolved ape.
2007-03-20 10:24:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow, that's harsh...apparently the "latest" thinking has it at 95% similarity now - have a read of this, it might give you a chuckle after that onslaught:
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/99_myth_is_dead.php
2007-03-20 10:25:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No and neither is ours.Don't listen to the BS.The RN factor alone separates us from apes.We have commomnality only because we live on the same planet and need the same things to survive in our environment.
2007-03-20 10:20:38 · answer #6 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
His body doesn't matter. And no he did not think about these kinds of things. The enlightened man is 100% light, and DNA is as useless as uncovering the number of hairs on his head.
2007-03-20 10:18:29 · answer #7 · answered by Julian 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
If he was human and of the flesh then you're damn right! Tell you this, he was a great man so it is too bad they fabricated their idiot religiosity around his simple genius.
2007-03-20 10:18:56 · answer #8 · answered by larrydoyle52 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That is insulting and offensive and unnecessary.
It might be factually correct, but you are trying to imply something, which is not really required, but is provocative.
2007-03-20 10:33:42 · answer #9 · answered by wafer 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Torturing Fundies are you. If he was human I would say so.
2007-03-20 10:21:01 · answer #10 · answered by Uncle Meat 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋