Why do war mongers say we are fighting for US freedom in Iraq? Since when was Iraq ever a threat to the US?...

Question

the only threat to the US is Bush and his WMD lies. US soldiers are brainwashed to think they are fighting for our freedom but they are fighting for Bush's agenda. What makes me laugh is when the dead soldier's mother says she is soo proud of her dead son for fighting for his country. Tell me again what is he fighting for? WHAT? I can't hear you...... who's freedom?

Answer 1

Did you come up with this question all on your own?

Answer 2

It is easier for Fascists to operate when the checks and balances of American law are suspended in time of war. The Patriot act ushered in a Nazi SS like quality to the American government, but the general public is a little slow on the uptake. It will dawn on them when the corporate run Federal government takes the entire industrial base of the United States of America to cheaper labor over seas, and they no longer have a means of supporting the American population or equipping the American military.

If you have answers instead of rants, I'm open to suggestions. The Bush administration is basically Fascist (fascism is defined as corporate run government) and so are both political parties. The Democrats seem to be the lesser of two evils, but in reality Clinton's NAFTA & GATT just nailed the coffin shut on an American economy whose throat was cut by Ronald Reagan's removal of protectionist tariffs.
The blogbaba is stuck at "In God we Trust", because my friend, God is all that stands between us and anarchy.

Answer 3

every time in history once you're in basic terms prepared to safeguard our very own boarders we can be attacked lower back jointly as the enemy grows enhanced. In WWII we did not something while Japan became murdering thousands and thousands of the chinese language, then we've been given attacked. We knew Bin weighted down became planing stuff yet we merely sat back and lunched some cruise missles. Then 9/11 occurs. as long as we enable human beings to locate a shelter to have a base of opperations we can consistently get attacked. we could see under clintions do not something we the place attacked someplace approximately each and every 2 years. because 9/11 not something, that's working. undergo in strategies we are struggling with an enemy that desires to kill us, and under there rule you does not be waiting to have a job, you would be compelled to placed on what your guy needs you to placed on.

Answer 4

Why was I vaccinated against ANTHRAX, and on 6hr air alert to go to Iraq, while deployed in Okinawa In 1998?

1998?
1998?
1998?
1998?

Is that an example of Mr. Bush and Bad neocons, or is it an an example of good infantry Marines, ready to conduct expiditionary maneuver warfare, to enforce the 1991 cease fire resolution with the Baath regime violated?

1998?
1998?
1998?

Answer 5

Questions like this demonstrate the short-sightedness and lack of analysis that allowed Bin Laden to run free for 10 years prior to 9/11.

Asking this question is like asking: "Did North Africa threaten us in WWII?"

Learn some history and geography.

BTW: Have you _ever_ looked at a map of the Middle East and pondered the location of Iraq form a strategic viewpoint?

Answer 6

Fighting against people like you who enslave and murder your countrymen including innocent women and children in the markets and in schools. Its the kind of terror that falls below animal level and so we ended up in Iraq becaue there were WMDs, and chemical weapons are again being used by the terrorists there and to give Iraqis a chance to be free. You certainly are not interested in freedom. Lets see how many wacked up libs will agree with you in this blog.

Answer 7

Here is what your brilliant Democrats were saying:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

Answer 8

ballz, they CAN'T tell you why- they're drowing in a cesspool of propganda, flooding their airwaves from right wing hate radio. There is no factual reason for this war, and there never has been. the fact that the Bush administration has changed it's "reasons" for the invasion and subsequent disaster so many times speaks volumes for just how inept and unprepared they were.

Answer 9

Thats odd. I coulda sworn the name of the operation was Iraqi Freedom.

Perhaps you misheard it?

Answer 10

I agree

unfortunately since this liar has gotten us into this quagmiere,
Iraq is NOW a threat to US

Answer 11

Since never! We are fighting to strengthen the oil coffers of Zion Bush.