why do so many people moan about our troops being sent into war zones?

Question

did the troops not know that they may be required to fight? Or did they think it would be all assult coures and paint ball?

Answer 1

They moan because they have nothing better to do .I like many others served in the armed forces and clearly understood my duty and the possible co sequences.People blather on about things they neither understand nor would be fit to do themselves taking simplistic and uneducated views of the world believing that it would be a perfect world if we all danced around with flowers in our hair .They would soon get bored and start thinking it would be a good idea to go for a drive - but wait a minute we cant there's no oil.

Answer 2

I think most rational people understand that on an occasional basis our troops will be required to bare arms in conflict. I think the moaning and groaning is specific to this war zone. When you overlook or remove extremists thoughts (i.e., we did it for oil or this is an illegal war) when you just look at the thoughts of day-to-day normal people, you will generally find two very different ideas on the best way to fight terrorism. One being viewed as traditional conservative is that the USA was attacked and it was in our best interest to move the theater or war to another country. "Attack them there so they don't attack here" - an offensive position. The second being a more liberal or progressive idea is that the money spent on the war would have been better spent updating and enlarging our internal methods of defense or infrastructure. Specifically computer upgrades for the FBI and CIA (so that we can better track terrorist activities), border security, and increased surveillance and intelligence (and eventual capture of terrorist). A defensive position. Most Americans support something in the middle and are very upset that the extremists on either side of the political spectrum have divided the country on one of our most important missions.

Answer 3

I'm sure that most troops know there a chance they may have to go and fight and maybe die fighting for their country, but they all think it wont be them that gets killed or injured. The sad thing about it is, this country doesn't appreciate what they have done, and if they come back maimed, they wont get any help from the government in recuperation, as we have all seen on the news recently. That's really sad !

Answer 4

People "moan" about the war and our troops, because that is their son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, cousin, whatever. Because their soldier/sailor/marine/airman is away from home for up to a year or more. Because for some of them it's the 3rd or 4th time they are going to war in the last 6 years. How would you like it if you were away from everyone you loved for 4 of the last 6 years?

Answer 5

As with any job, you are told certain things, while others are omitted. Add that to the fact that the U.S. Military is primarily made up of young, right out of high school types. Not worldly by any stretch of the imagination. They listen to a recruiter, who's only job is to make sure that the number of enlistees is met, who tell the recruits that they will get $60,000 for college, be able to get a high paying profession, will see the world, and will be showered with accolades from the citizens. They get in, are trained and sent to the war zone. When you think about it, most probably don't think that they will be required to fight. Think of the number of military in the world, compared to the number in Iraq. A relatively small percentage. Especially those in the Guard and Reserve. They join to be close to home, to fight natural disasters, and civil actions, not go off to a foreign country to fight a war.

Answer 6

the place to even initiate. a million. the administrative place of work of america grow to be empowered by utilising Congress to apply rigidity against Iraq. 2. many diverse motives have been given. the single reason maximum voters latched directly to grow to be weapons of Mass Destruction. maximum folk in effortless terms pay attention what they like to pay attention. 3. Legally talking. whilst the ceasefire with Iraq grow to be signed after the Gulf conflict any violation of such an aggrement might consequence in the previous state of conflict between america and Iraq. The Iraqi's had violated the contract quite a few circumstances before by utilising firing on coalition planes patrolling the no fly zones. those movements have been acts of conflict and in step with the words of the ceasefire authorized any protection rigidity action permissable under the geneva convention. 4. reducing investment as a ability to get rid of troops out of Iraq is a political ploy which will in effortless terms backfire. One, the President ought to and could veto one in all those bill because of the fact it grow to be so narrowly surpassed and the bill would be defeated. 2, there a techniques much less underhanded and proper a thank you to right exchange. 3, you in no way play politics with investment for squaddies. 5. the international geopolitical destablization is plenty extra accomplishing than maximum folk understand or care approximately. america ought to teach it has the fortitude to combat. Why I touched on many stuff i desire this sufficiently solutions your question.

Answer 7

Men join the Forces to fight for Queen and Country - it is voluntary. My late husband fought in World War 2 (he was much older than I am!). He didn't have a choice. He was in the Infantry on D-Day , right through to the freedom of Holland - wounded twice but sent back to the front line after treatment in England for the first injury.
His youth was taken from him and his chance for a career.
He suffered nightmares but there was no psychological help then.

Answer 8

If the public does not think that the nation needs to use the military to protect itself and interests then there will not be support for troops being deployed. If the threat was actually credible then of course everyone will be on board, but distant wars that certainly do not affect our national security, especially when anyone with common sense can see that diplomacy could do ten times more than any military force can. If our government was capable of actually talking to (instead of "at") people we could do so much, but since the military is a much better tool that can later be blamed for any failures instead of on the politicians who failed at diplomacy then it's better.

Answer 9

Its the policies of government that send the troops to war zones that people are moaning about not the troops, they have to do what they are told.

Answer 10

They don't they moan about why we always fight other peoples wars what has changed in Iraq other than us loosing loads of good soldiers/people.That is why we get so angry with the world and the politics behind these bloody stupid wars understand now ?