English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

I am not certain whether anyone has made a precise measurement with a substantial body of empiric evidence to support the idea that there is such a boundary in any objectively real sense. I think it is really just a boundary in terms of our understanding since we do not yet know exactly how all quantum mechanical scale interactions work relative to ordinary scale physics, but I would guess that it would be near to -2.7e+43 metres. Larger than that and we tend to lose the repeatability of observable quantum mechanical effects. Smaller than that and we lose the ability to predict some of the behavior of objects like particles by using Newtonian physical laws.

2007-03-20 02:55:32 · answer #1 · answered by Michael Darnell 7 · 1 0

I don't know either. Maybe when you start to need machines to see the quantum level for you or what can't be seen with the human eye.

2007-03-20 07:35:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I dont know. I cant find that dawgone thing either.

2007-03-20 07:22:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers