Isn't it weird that the is no archelogical evidence of thousand of Jews wandering in the Desert?

Question

Yeah,there are hardly any evidence in this story.The story where the Jews were forbidden to enter to chosen land and wandering in the desert for about forty years has no archeological support.There are about 15,000 Jews wandering in the desert yet no single evidence to support this story.Surely it is only A STORY,RIGHT?????????????

Answer 1

i for sure as heck wouldnt be following some guy in the desert for 40 years... after one year i would have been like...

okay he doesnt know where he is going...

Answer 2

Actually, the trip was supposed to take only a week, but Moses refused to stop and ask directions.

Seriously though, you're absolutely wrong about the proof.

One of the best proofs is the excavation of the city of Jericho, which archeologist claimed didn't exist, and then they claimed it could have never fallen as it was described in the Bible.

Once Jericho was finally discovered and excavated, EVERY biblical detail was confirmed ... even the fact that the city walls fell outward and created ramps that allowed the Israelites quick and easy access to the city.

Answer 3

it is not that huge a barren region, and not so some distance from civilization. non secular archaeologists have been pretty prompted to discover the info, yet so some distance have in elementary terms got here upon some corals in the crimson Sea that look like wheels in case you squint puzzling adequate. it rather is that the info is there and hasn't been got here upon yet, yet because of the fact the barren region is small and nicely-explored, that seems no longer likely. There are Egyptian archives of Israelites residing in Egypt quicker or later, so the historians wager that they migrated in the direction of the barren region progressively, in small communities, and hearsay inflated it into the story of Exodus.

Answer 4

it was written that only the children would emerge
the old ones were left behind
the elders tell the dreaming
there are no foot prints when the ground will not yeild
if you have ever been in the desert you would know
the desert keeps its secrets
even your number seems wrong
your point being?
you belierve in evolution do you not?
what matters it to one who disbelieves all
not allowed of peer revieuw called science [prevailing theory]

Answer 5

There isn't even a mention of the Jews as slaves to the Egyptians...There is some mention of slaves, but there was a single term applied to them on a whole, not as a ethnic group. As for Christians who think this means nothing to them...this is where the precursor to your own religion begins...

Answer 6

Seeing as they were a tribe WANDERING around in the desert,what type of archaeological evidence would you expect to find?

Answer 7

Not really. Deserts don't exactly yield a lot of archaelogical evidence, especially evidence of nomads who couldn't even be bothered to build a fixed temple and kept their holy relics in a tent.

Answer 8

it's no story my friend, the truth is, the journey was about 10 days, but one of them lost a quarter or 50c and so they all wandered the dessert for 40 years until they found it.

Answer 9

And the lack of evidence surprises you?

I think the less evidence, the more appealing it becomes to people who are looking for a crutch to lean on.

Maybe they have some evidence............of the same calibre as the shard of the true cross and the shroud of turin.

Answer 10

Have you ever been to the desert? Your footprints disappear in mere seconds. Imagine how much can be hidden in four thousand + years.

Answer 11

Maybe you should stop by the Pennsylvania Museum of archeology at Penn Universtiy. Then you might realize just how much you missed. Please research before making to bold a statement.